Replies

You keep saying over and over that we and Q "trust the DOJ"...Q doesn't say "Trust the DOJ". He says, "Trust Sessions". See the diff?

ROFL, is that what passes here for senior level logic and analysis? Apparently it does, since you just floated it to me as a trial response LOL.

So you actually believe Mr. Magoo, alone, is running around issuing these 50,000 sealed indictments Q has convinced you exist? Or are you willing to admit that he would need some assistance in such a monumental task? And who, therefore, do you think the Chief of the DOJ would have at his disposal to assist him then? Members of the DOJ, quite obviously! So if you trust Sessions to get the job done, you are having to trust his current DOJ.

I certainly understand why you’d be reluctant to admit that you, and Q, and Sessions are tied at the hip with the DOJ, but in the scenario you have created for yourself, there’s just no other way to explain it. Either you believe in the current DOJ, with Sessions at the top, or you don’t. Q says to believe in the DOJ, while Trump says they’re a disgrace. My money is on Trump being right, and that he’s not the liar Q has accused him of being.

So you actually believe Mr. Magoo, alone, is running around issuing these 50,000 sealed indictments Q has convinced you exist?

Uhhhhhhhhhhh NO! Those totals are derived from the individual websites of the 50 States.

I'm beginning to realize that your levels of awareness; your degree of research thoroughness; your levels of perceptiveness, your logical skills and your analytical capacities are all soooo inadequate, insufficient as to render further replies to you a worthless waste of time and energy.

There may be some value in replies not to you but spring-boarding off of your absurd blathering but I hope to keep even those to a bare minimum.

Or are you willing to admit that he would need some assistance in such a monumental task?

Since you insist on appearing to be a retard (or are you really one?), here comes lesson #2.

Sessions absolutely does have assistance. Google Jonathan Huber (I refuse to do your homework for you). Then look up the Q posts that talk about Horowitz/Huber and their 470 (I think) investigators.

And then think logically, if you are capable. How would an enemy take control of an agency? By placing like-minded people in KEY POSITIONS of leadership. For example, in this instance, the DOJ.

First, the derps corrupted the leadership with political appointment, and then over time, they purged the ethical and non-corrupt and stockpiled it with their own unethical and corrupt affiliates.

Then, go look up the list of upper level DOJ derps that have been removed one way or another.

And this time. Try to actually think.

You really can't be this stupid. Can you?

p.s. Go consult a village elder. Hahaha.

p.p.s. I'm starting to think no amount of evidence, education, or common sense will get through the mud into your think box. Is there hope for you, goodman?

Bagster

ROFL, is that what passes here for senior level logic and analysis?

You have the wrong idea, Fran Tardenton.

I'm not the smart one. I'm the obnoxious one.

#BetterAxtSomebody

Bagster