It seems the group listed Drake as a “prominent whistleblower” in such a way that Drake felt it implied association and he wanted to make clear there was none. The group removed his name. Perhaps Q cited those links because Drake also comments that the fact they included his name might call into question the group’s integrity. So my impression is that Drake is not in question but that his comments about the group were the most useful (balanced?).
I looked again and am still unsure. I don’t like they have drops apparently scheduled every other day for next week - that’s “clickbait” and NOT a “report” that we were “promised”. It’s not too much different than Wikileaks though - ultimately it will be any derivatives that are the subject; if they present things of value, it will be those documents or evidence or subjects themselves that will be the subject(s) of scrutiny.
The curious thing I think is the tangential relationship that’s present in the “Q” post - Drake remains an unknown for me (apparently anti-Trump whistleblower - not necessarily good nor bad, yet = unknown). Drake is then tied to jtfmaga which is tied to OANN and then Posobiec - at least I think I have that chain right. I like OANN, used to like Posobiec & now know he’s a fool but don’t dismiss anything +/- everything otherwise.