It's a little strange that it hasn't been discussed here (has it?), and the only FreeQs I saw engaging on the FR thread was Bagster.
There were some others defending Q on the thread though, and they did a pretty good job.
Free Republic Thread: QAnon Hoax Starter Exposed by Jack Posobiec - A 3-Part Series
YouTube Q IDENTIFIED, ORIGINAL Q PROVEN TROLL | WITH EVIDENCE NOONE CAN ARGUE"
Twitter feed of Ginger McQueen with Jack Posobiec Videos
Q Q is a novel by Luther Blissett first published in Italian in 1999. The novel is set in Europe during the 16th century, and deals with Protestant reformation movements."Luther Blissett" was a nom de plume for four Italian authors (Roberto Bui, Giovanni Cattabriga, Federico Guglielmi and Luca Di Meo) who were part of the "Luther Blissett Project", which ended in 1999. They now write under the name Wu Ming.
PLOT
Q Paperbackq big.jpg First edition (Italian) Author Luther Blissett (nom de plume) Translator Shaun Whiteside Country Italy Language Italian Genre Historical novel Publisher Einaudi Publication date 1999 Published in English 2003 Q is a novel by Luther Blissett first published in Italian in 1999. The novel is set in Europe during the 16th century, and deals with Protestant reformation movements. "Luther Blissett" was a nom de plume for four Italian authors (Roberto Bui, Giovanni Cattabriga, Federico Guglielmi and Luca Di Meo) who were part of the "Luther Blissett Project", which ended in 1999. They now write under the name Wu Ming. The novel has been translated into Danish, Dutch, English (British and American), French, German, Greek, Korean, Lithuanian, Polish, Russian, Turkish, Basque, Czech, Portuguese (Brazilian), Spanish and Serbian. All of the editions keep the original copyright statement, which allows for non-commercial reproduction of the book. Contents 1 Plot 2 Interpretations and controversy 3 News of film adaptation 4 Altai: a "return to Q " 5 Historical characters and events 6 Editions 7 See also 8 Notes 9 External links Plot The book follows the journey of an Anabaptist radical across Europe in the first half of the 16th century as he joins in various movements and uprisings that come as a result of the Protestant reformation. The book spans 30 years as he is pursued by 'Q' (short for "Qoèlet"), a spy for the Roman Catholic Church cardinal Giovanni Pietro Carafa. The main character, who changes his name many times during the story, first fights in the German Peasants' War beside Thomas Müntzer, during which time he takes part in negotiations which are eventually formalised as the Twelve Articles. Following this, he battles in Münster's siege, during the Münster Rebellion, and some years later, in Venice.
Here's the thing Pollard. And I'll just use my own personal brain as an example. Others may agree, or not.Very well put.You cite some guys. They are just some guys. Lots of guys say lots of things. Hell, I say lots of things.
The thing is, what do we believe? What is the TRUTH?
Do we believe Jerome Corsi? Praying Medic? Neon Revolt? Anons? Sean Hannity? Jack Black? Bagster?
What we do, is take in EVERYTHING and sift out the truth, based on many factors.
So I guess what I'm really saying is this. Nobody is special. In the end, even Donald Trump is just a guy.
For me? The BODY OF EVIDENCE proves Q to be what we believe him to be. And with that belief, comes credibility.
I do add what some unidentified random anons from 4/8chan say to my ponder box. But what they say is graded on a scale. And their grade is very low.
So, on balance, my brain (which is amazing, I must say) debunks this particular debunkery.
Keep in mind, I'm just a guy.
Even if Q were proved to be a hoax, to some extent it doesn't matter now. The work done by the anons, interpreters and FreeQs has tremendous value.
The finger pointing at the moon is not the moon. Now we see the moon.
Posobiec already debunked himself when he highlighted his lack of any essential level of technical expertise when he found the aggregator source code base. So then he went to anonymous sources ROFL
Man, you spotted a Q in the wild!
And in your mind that debunks everything else, huh?
Your argument seems quite shallow to me, but to each their own.
If you like your novel theory, you can keep your novel theory.
I dont find it very novel either.
Im glad you are happy. Carry on.
We dont waste our precious time with idiotic unproven nonsense.
But hey jack, knock yourself out
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I saw the OANN Report, and felt sorry for them, because I like the network. But they got suckered.
No one familiar with Q takes it seriously.
As I said yesterday, the only significance of the "Report" is that Q has now moved to a new level of exposure (Cable News).