Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: jmacusa

Southern democrats of the 18th century were conservative to the bone. States rights conservatives. The Whig/Republican Party, especially the Republican Party of Lincoln, were big government liberals. Lincoln and Marx were great admirers of each other.


105 posted on 09/06/2018 2:35:18 PM PDT by NKP_Vet ("Man without God descends into madness")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: NKP_Vet
Jefferson formed the Democrat-Republican Party which later became the Democrat Party by the 1830s and was pro-slavery. While Marx and Lincoln exchanged letters Lincoln and Republicanism Lincoln was against slavery while the Southern democrats, with British sympathies were pro slavery. The fact remain unchanged, The South went to war to preserve an economic system based on the use of slave labor and expand it into the new territories in the West. “Bleeding Kansas’ is a good example of that.
131 posted on 09/06/2018 11:56:55 PM PDT by jmacusa (Made it Ma, top of the world!'')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet; jmacusa; BroJoeK; LS; rockrr
Southern democrats of the 18th century were conservative to the bone. States rights conservatives. The Whig/Republican Party, especially the Republican Party of Lincoln, were big government liberals.

You may mean the 19th century. Democracy was still controversial in the 18th century.

If I could buy and sell people and force them to work for me without pay I wouldn't want the federal government messing with that either, especially if people like me controlled state and local government.

But Southern Democrats weren't opposed to using the federal government to protect and promote and extend slavery. They also weren't any great friends of freedom of speech or the press or contract or movement.

And those "big government liberal Whig/Republicans"? What did they want?

Federal aid for roads and canals. Protection from foreign competition for industry. Maybe the Homestead Act and land grant state colleges.

Not exactly a massive federal bureaucracy.

Nothing that Taft or Coolidge or Eisenhower or Reagan or Trump would have much trouble with.

Right and left, liberal and conservative can mean different things at different times and under different circumstances.

If those Southern Democrats had been able to make the country, the continent and the world safe for slavery, many Americans would have regarded that as a radical departure from our best traditions.

Also, you have to consider whether or not slavery was bad enough to be something you'd want to worry about -- whether or not it could be an exception to the idea that the federal government should keep its nose out of local and state affairs.

If I'd been around in the 1850s, I might well have supported the Democrats thinking that they were the more conservative party.

But I would have been wrong.

151 posted on 09/07/2018 1:53:37 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson