Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jonty30

“It seemed like a stupid decision to eliminate those planes in the first place. They are very good planes for the right missions.”

Agree 100%. The bogus excuse was that it was “too slow”, if memory serves.

Worse, they were going to replace it with a plane ill-equipped to be a decent attack plane and give adequate air support (especially in a mountainous area). The B2 I think.

Only the A-10 can do the job of an A-10.


28 posted on 09/01/2018 5:06:39 PM PDT by MichaelCorleone (Jesus Christ is not a religion. He's the Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: MichaelCorleone

I would like to see what a CAS drone built around that cannon could do.


31 posted on 09/01/2018 5:15:32 PM PDT by yawningotter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: MichaelCorleone

A ground attack plane needs a LOW stall speed.

Stall is 120 knots for the A10.

That’s amazing for a plane that can fly at 380 knots and carry a huge load.

It just ain’t safe to be close to the ground if you have a high stall speed!


42 posted on 09/01/2018 5:50:36 PM PDT by Bobalu (12 diet Cokes and a fried chicken...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson