Yes, Daniel is normally a man's name and that is me, and your seemingly man-hating emotional vindictive response only serves to affirm what the article says. Which is not that women have no place in the military, but their position, of support and not combat or leadership. And which is the general consensus on the comments here.
And which positional is what is most consistent with the Scriptural position, and if you differ with that, then this veteran in the Lord's army - the only one I have been in - will gladly take you on, since you would then be attacking not men, but the word of God. Which is why I hold my position, and not because of any animus toward women (and, thank God for them).
No women allowed in the Lord's army I take it?