EasySt,
~~~”I have to respectfully disagree on a couple following points:
Why are you allowing the 2.5% (80% are good, 17.5% are at the effect of the 2.5% - the 2.5% are the ones who are consciously out to destroy good) of the population dictate what you do and how you run the various operations to drain the swamp?
I believe it is because those 2.5% still wield tremendous power (as they still inhabit various levels of government and the Military) - or is that not the case?
If this is not the case, then you do a diservice to those in the Military and in society who have been wronged by this man.”~~~
Right now the MSM still has control of the uninformed public. I would not like to see mass riots in the streets. These riots would be ginned up with all the lies backed by the Left, on almost every media station.
~~~”By not ‘coming clean’ you create negative emotions in people which ‘negatively’ effects any future that could be positive.
There are less of (((them))) then there are of us. Even you have said that. People KNOW what the truth is. Heck, even my 21 year old nephew from England knew the guy was bad, as did his friends.”~~~
POTUS is attacking the MSM constantly, why?
Until the majority of the population sees the TRUTH, reaction from the general population is not foreseeable.
Q has stated that they do not want mayhem, riots, etc. It comes down to timing. When the general population FINALLY GETS IT (it being the TRUTH). Only then can all of the information be brought forward.
I would surmise the average IQ of FreeQ’s is in the +110 and higher. However, the average IQ of the general population is in the 70-90’s (read that somewhere). A large portion of the population still believes what they see in the MSM.
A few ‘chess pieces’ still need to be maneuvered into position.
“Enjoy the Show” :)
Please see my follow up posts on the subject.
I probably could have left that anon’s post out of the discussion, and still made my point about our ultimate responsibility.
Or I could have gone ahead and pointed out the problems with that anon’s post at the time.
But it serves a purpose to discuss such concerns in the larger context.