Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote
NEW Q

#1980

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: ea669f No.2779677 📁
Aug 29 2018 00:02:38 (EST)

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: ea669f No.2779165 📁
Aug 28 2018 23:36:08 (EST)
>>2779059
Why is POTUS pushing the FBI & DOJ on this issue?
What if access to the server(s) was deliberate?
What if this is 'known' within the intelligence community?
What if this is 'known' within the FBI & DOJ?
If known - why no action?
How might this discredit the FBI's investigation into HRC's emails?
How might this OPEN THE DOOR to [WEINER] / [Huma] / [HRC]?
Logical thinking.
WHY WAS THE INFORMATION ON WEINER'S LAPTOP IN THE FIRST PLACE?
D5.
Q
>>2779165
What if a paper-trail exists…
PDB via No Such Agency?
HUSSEIN made aware w/ no action?
Why did POTUS refuse 'select' PDBs during transition?
Who knew?
Threat assessment.
Adm Rogers?
FLYNN?
Why did HUSSEIN + HRC + ADMIN + Staff + … use private emails to communicate?
Was HRC the only one to use unsecured server(s)?
If access was granted re: HRC private server(s) can you assume access was granted re: House server(s) re: AWAN?
AWAN>Pakistani Intelligence?
AWAN FREE?
Huma>Muslim Brotherhood?
Matters of NAT SEC.
Q

__________________________________________________________

1,945 posted on 08/28/2018 10:06:10 PM PDT by No_Doll_i
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1944 | View Replies ]


To: No_Doll_i
#1978

>>2779165
https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download📁
Reconcile.
1 = 1?
1 = 0?
Evidence of an ongoing investigation…..
Q

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

There is a well-known mathematical "proof" that 1=0.

Of course, there is an error in it ... a step where the mortal sin is committed of "dividing by zero"

The purpose of the "proof" is to demonstrate the fallacy of dividing by Zero.

Hmm. Wasn't that what we experienced for 8 years?

1,950 posted on 08/28/2018 10:20:01 PM PDT by Disestablishmentarian (Read "American Betrayal" by Diana West)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1945 | View Replies ]

To: No_Doll_i; LucyT; Q

And this is why we need our Space Army plus other tidbits from CNN no less... Date 1998

Clinton Defends China Satellite Waiver
White House delivers papers to Congress in support of the deal
WASHINGTON (May 22) — President Bill Clinton on Friday defended a controversial satellite deal with China, even as White House officials delivered documents to the House International Relations Committee about the arrangement.

The president said the deal to launch U.S. satellites on rockets owned by other nations was “correct” and “based on what I thought was in the national interest and supportive of our national security.”

rudman
“There was absolutely nothing done to transfer any technology inappropriately to the Chinese as a result of this decision,” Clinton said. “I believe it was in the national interest and I can assure you it was handled in the routine course of business, consistent with the 10-year-old policy.”

The White House backed up that claim by releasing about 400 pages of declassified documents claiming the presidential waiver was consistent with U.S. policy and had been recommended by the president’s national security adviser, the State Department and the Pentagon.

White House legislative liaison Mara Rudman, accompanied by at least one White House lawyer, delivered the documents to the House International Relations Committee Friday morning. Rudman was carrying two folders of papers as she arrived at the committee office, but made no comment.

Congressional critics, both Democrats and Republicans, say the Chinese may have had access to sophisticated U.S. satellite and missile technology during an investigation into a failed launch attempt on a Chinese rocket in 1996.

gilman
And Republicans have accused Clinton of jeopardizing national security by granting the waiver to please a high-dollar Democratic donor.

A spokesman told CNN the committee does not expect the papers to include a pivotal document from the Defense Department, purportedly linking a possibly illegal transfer of technology with a cooperative investigation among China and two American defense contractors, Loral Space and Communications and Hughes Electronics.

Rep. Ben Gilman (R-N.Y.) hinted the documents may not be as exculpatory as the White House indicated. “Let me just say that some of the documents do raise troubling questions that will have to be pursued,” Gilman said. “They make clear that the president was informed that Loral may have contributed technology to China’s ballistic missile program before he decided to grant Loral a waiver on February 18th of this year to permit them to export yet another satellite to China.”

But how much do we really know?
It’s a fact Loral Space and Communications hired the Chinese to launch one of their satellites two years ago because Chinese rocket launches are relatively cheap. Technically, that is an export of a U.S. satellite to China.

But Loral says the Chinese never got their hands on the satellite itself. And Pentagon officials confirm sensitive technology was encased in a metal “black box” and watched over from factory to launch pad by Department of Defense employees.

rocket
There has been bipartisan support for such launches. President Ronald Reagan first initiated the policy 10 years ago. And President George Bush approved nine while Clinton has approved 11, according to the Congressional Research Service.

But concerns have heated up. To launch satellites, China used “Long March” boosters, the same ones they use for intercontinental nuclear missiles, some said to be aimed at U.S. cities.

They weren’t very good. The one carrying Loral’s satellite blew up 30 seconds after launch on Feb. 15, 1996, costing Loral’s insurance companies about $200 million.

Afterward Loral admits it gave the Chinese a written report about the cause of the rocket failure, without official clearance. A Pentagon office concluded in a still-secret report that “United States national security has been harmed,” according to government officials. And Loral confirms it is now under investigation by a federal grand jury as a result.

And one House International Relations Committee source, speaking to CNN on background, said the committee plans to focus its investigation on this cooperation.

Loral’s chairman Bernard Schwartz denies Loral did anything illegal. In its own defense, Loral says Chinese engineers found the problem — the rocket failure was caused by bad solder joints — without Loral’s help. And they say “no ‘secret’ or ‘classified’ information was ever discussed with the Chinese or included in any reports provided to the Chinese.”

Privately, Pentagon officials minimize the affair. One told CNN that the alleged harm to national security was “not significant or substantial ... about a one or two on a scale of ten.”

CNN’s Brooks Jackson and Paul Courson contributed to this report.
In Other News
Friday, May 22, 1998
• Judge: Secret Service Must Testify
• Congress Passes Giant Transportation Bill
• Clinton Warns Against Biological, Computer Attacks
• Clinton Defends China Satellite Waiver
• Pentagon Admits Release Of Private Tripp Info
Profile:
• Bernard Schwartz Gave Heavily To Democrats
• FEC Data: Schwartz’s Recent Contributions

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/05/22/china.money/


2,015 posted on 08/29/2018 5:07:57 AM PDT by DAVEY CROCKETT (Thank you President Trump, Amos5:15 Hate evil, love good, And establish justice in the gate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1945 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson