Q Anon: 08/25/18 Trust Trump's Plan

qmap.pub ^ | 8/25/18 | FReepers, vanity

[DAVEY CROCKETT]

I am hoping its a game of good cop bad cop routine, my parents played this game well when we were teenagers, until I caught on, then the fun really began. LOL

[RitaOK]

Yes! Right again. I said that ******1885, as well, in my initial post this morning, to Steven W.
So your “Whopper”’remark was a mystery. I thought it was aimed at the information from the Anons that I was posting. Silly me. Guess you meant it for me. I could tell you hadn’t read what I read, so I had the audacity to inquire. Got called “cranky” in response.

Full moon, huh?

[Cboldt]

I think Mueller is in that spot because Trump wanted to give his enemies a known place to camp out as they plan and execute their attacks. I believe Trump knew Mueller (and Comey, and a few others) were out to get him by all means possible.

No way is Mueller a white hat, that's been my view all along.

I dither a bit on Roesnstein. Initially thought he was clean (in dealing with Trump), but now I really doubt it.

[riri]

Funny, I was just listening to X22 Report. He just said something to the effect of, "Think about this: Trump put certain individuals into certain positions that are normally held by civilians. Marine generals serving in positions normally held by civilians. This is a military operation".

I think we have all kind of lost sight of that. I know I have.

His show was pretty good today, regarding Q.

[Cboldt]

-- Full moon, huh? --

Sheesh.

Obviously you missed my point. The whopper that I had not heard reported by the press was "No DEMs present."

08/29/2018 8:49:18 AM PDT . 2,117 of 2,284
Cboldt to RitaOK
-- Apparently it's a media lie or "misdirection" that there were no Democrats in attendance. --
Haven't run into that whopper yet.

Your reposne to me was "Did you read the link, or just couldn't find the message thread?"

I've had my fill of you. Now I'm cranky, but just at you and that Honeysuckle itch.

[HoneysuckleTN]

Ransomnote: I tried to help. But with all the concernfags and thread sliders sliding this thread, looks like it's a lost cause.

Cboldt:
If the rule is so bloody clear to everybody, there is no need to remind people at the top of each thread, and there is no need to debate what the rule is.

Apparently, it's not clear because people keep posting 8ch links. A reminder at the top of the thread would be helpful, I think. But that's up to Ransomnote.

I personally don't GAS if every post has 8ch links. I think they would be most helpful. But it's not my house and not my rules. It's FR's rule. How hard is that to understand?


If y'all are done sliding this thread, let's get back to Q

[Bigg Red]

Well said.

[ransomnote]

I’m sorry I didn’t mention the help I receive watching out for 8ch links earlier - I could have saved us some stress.

I am concerned with 8ch links and some FReepers know this and let me know when they see them, or ask FReeQs to remove them. I always thank FReepers for helping me with this. As you’ve probably heard me say, early on we had all our threads deleted without warning because a troll reported that we were posting 8ch. I received an email from the Admin instructing me to stop posting Q threads and thanking me. The only way our threads were reinstated was because I said I do not post 8ch links.

SO - this makes me really twitchy. We wouldn’t receive a warning, they’d be just “gone” if we become lax with 8ch links. I’ve seen some FReeQs post a portion of 8ch links and I’ve asked Admin about it, but I don’t receive responses to questions - I’d have to check to see if the post was gone to know what the “rule” is.

I see that Yo-Yo’s post is gone, therefore posting the link with a space in it does not meet FR standards.

As I said, I wish I had let people know earlier that some FReepers assist me by letting me know about 8ch links. Honeysuckle does caution people on my behalf - I meant to let people know and forgot. I am sorry. I do appreciate her help. I also appreciate those who contribute to our threads with links, so regret that 8ch links are a limiting factor here.

It’s not personal, it’s not being “hall monitor”, it’s thread protection and I appreciate it. I always thank HoneysuckleTN and others who let me know. We really don’t enjoy watching for this, it just comes with the thread maintenance task.

I do regret that it has caused stress.

[Bigg Red]

I’ll wait for Q to validate.

...

Please ping me if he does. TIA

[No_Doll_i]

Ok so far you have managed to piss off at least half the people on the thread, run a valuable poster off the Q thread entirely and YOU STILL haven’t figured out that YOU ARE THE CONCERNFAG AND SLIDER.

I am done being polite to you cause you obviously do not even understand that you are making yourself the problem.

Get a clue dear and knock off the holier than thou crap, it is very unbecoming.

[MomwithHope]

.

[CJ Wolf]

I hope that it’s ok to post this chan link, lots of fighting there too. https://youtu.be/E6NPK6Izeas

[AllAmericanGirl44]

A new Twitter with 5 tweets generated those numbers?
Sorry, I find it difficult to believe as a new Twitter would have zero followers to retweet your stuff. Please help me understand because it honestly doesn’t add up for me, thanks

[SERKIT]

Romney has a chub going on in his magic underwear awaiting his opportunity to be Voter #1 to convict The Donald. Romney is a ‘fake, a fraud, a phony’.

[SERKIT]

[blu]

As a former hall monitor (my 6 bros. & sisters grew up and moved away!) I found that one public rebuke, followed by PRIVATE conversations were the most effective. No one likes to be called out in public, and face it, nobody likes the hall monitor whose gone power mad. Gently gentle reminders (as in the way you talk to us) are most effective.

[Icuhaji]

ThankQ for the link

[blu]

Very funny. You’re filling in for Bagster, aren’t you?v

[Bigg Red]

mark

[SaveFerris]

Nothing less than a battle for the country. Traitors versus the President and the rest of us who don’t drink the liberal Kool-Aid.