Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Heads up: Fujitsu tips its hand to reveal exascale Arm supercomputer processor – the A64FX
The Register ^ | 22 August 2018 | Chris Williams

Posted on 08/22/2018 10:51:33 AM PDT by ShadowAce

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

If it’s a Bethesda game it will still get 30 FPS in populated areas.


21 posted on 08/22/2018 12:24:07 PM PDT by LambSlave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

Will it implement the HCF command?


22 posted on 08/22/2018 12:45:45 PM PDT by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing Obamacare is worse than Obamacare itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

And I thought a PDP-8 was pretty slick....


23 posted on 08/22/2018 1:04:04 PM PDT by wouldilie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wouldilie

The PDP-8 WAS pretty slick. I have about 150 IM6100 chips that someday I am going to turn into PDP-8 dev boards so we OFs can relive our youth. :-)


24 posted on 08/22/2018 2:06:15 PM PDT by beef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: LambSlave

More like 3FPS :p


25 posted on 08/22/2018 3:57:47 PM PDT by Bikkuri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: wouldilie

My High school had a PDP-8 back in the very early 70’s i first learned to programme on that machine. Had a card reader, and DEC terminals. No monitors. I/O was to tractor fed paper. The terminals could also read DEC tape (the yellow ribbon strips that had punch holes).

i still miss it.


26 posted on 08/22/2018 5:07:54 PM PDT by Calvinist_Dark_Lord ((I have come here to kick @$$ and chew bubblegum...and I'm all outta bubblegum! ~Roddy Piper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Ridiculous. Nobody needs more than 640K.


27 posted on 08/22/2018 5:14:01 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

Their is no temporal cure for Original Sin or its consequences.


28 posted on 08/22/2018 6:28:29 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

I still have my dBase 4 manual and user’s guide. Just can’t bear to throw them away.


29 posted on 08/23/2018 5:46:06 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Get in the Spirit! The Spirit of '76!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: entropy12
You would think with all these super-fast computers, cancer would be cured by now...

Cancer is not a disease. It is a category of disease, with every one being different.

30 posted on 08/23/2018 7:06:33 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

You missed my point badly. I never said anything about what cancer is or is not.

Since you failed to understand what my main point was...again it was...

Garbage in-——>faster computer——>faster garbage out.

If faster computers were the anti-dote for intelligence of human beings, we should be able to predict weather better 2 days ahead, be able to predict where earthquakes will happen, predict who will get cancer based on DNA and genetics, predict that Hillary was going to lose in spite of the polls, and so on and so on.

Super fast computers have failed in all of the above.


31 posted on 08/23/2018 9:12:15 AM PDT by entropy12 (Trump/Pence 2020)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: entropy12
...predict who will get cancer based on DNA and genetics...

Again, you are lumping "cancer" into a single thing. It's not.

If faster computers were the anti-dote for intelligence of human beings...

And your premise is incorrect. The faster, more powerful technology becomes, the stupider humanity gets because we don't have to think for ourselves. This is obviously a generalization, and I do not include any specific individual in that claim, but it sure seems observably true.

Super fast computers have failed in all of the above.

Given my last statement, this is not at all surprising as computers only do what the programmer tells tells them to do with the data that they have been provided. Since humanity is declining, our models/algorythms will also decline in quality.

I actually agree with 99% of what you are saying. I was just pointing out the one statement that was less than 100% accurate.

32 posted on 08/23/2018 2:35:49 PM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson