If you read the article the term aging is interchangeable with the term damage. They used MRIs to look for identifiable brain damage in a huge number of people. It is interesting that among all external hazards to the brain marijuana was listed as number one in this study. Marijuana caused 2.8 years of brain damage in contrast to alcohol which caused .6 years of brain damage. But in 3 - 2 - 1... we will be having the regulars claiming that marijuana causes no harm and benefits all parts of the body.
“Marijuana caused 2.8 years of brain damage in contrast to alcohol which caused .6 years of brain damage.”
Anyone who has been close to an alcoholic questions this assertion.
“Marijuana caused 2.8 years of brain damage in contrast to alcohol which caused .6 years of brain damage.”
I’ll drink to that!
False. I read the article - the term damage occurs nowhere in it.