Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bagster

TL, DR — plus, irritation if we debate this. Minds made up both ways, and I am postive I have exhausted the argument on my side. In short, this side rests.


367 posted on 08/23/2018 4:21:09 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt
The defense rests.

No closing arguments.

Let the jury deliberate.

Bagster


370 posted on 08/23/2018 4:30:13 AM PDT by bagster ( "Even bad men love their mamas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies ]

To: Cboldt
How robust is the legal distinction between sedition vs treason?

How critical, legally, is the DEGREE of survival being seriously at risk?

Given various actions by various Presidents over the decades . . . e.g. Lincoln, FDR et al . . . doing administrative actions not strictly Constitutional and getting away with it i.e. their actions stuck and they did not get in any legal trouble--what is the potential for THAT kind of action vis a vis military tribunals?

I'm doubtful POTUS would take THAT route but it is conceivable.

428 posted on 08/23/2018 8:27:57 AM PDT by JockoManning (http://www.zazzle.com/brain_truth for hats T's e.g. STAY CALM & DO THE NEXT LOVING THING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson