Paying women is not influencing an election.
Exactly. As long as they can’t prove campaign funds were used, it’s not illegal. And they didn’t force anything. The implication is they made offers to the parties for their silence and the parties agreed.
Right. Congress has been paying them off for years. And just because someone is paying does not even mean they are guilty. During the election the democrats were manufacturing sexual abuse claims against trump. So one might pay some of them off to make them go away.
Yep, but it seems Mueller and the rest of the crooks in this silent coup are squeezing Cohen and making him their puppet, having him say this BS to make it seem as if Trump cheated. It’s utterly ludicrous, because wearing a nice suit could be considered “influencing the election”. It’s such a BS loaded term, that’s what politicians do while campaigning, they try to “influence the election” but I must say: I can’t recall Trump ever paying for a fake dossier to scam a judge so he could wiretap Hillary. That apparently is OK for Democrats to do isn’t it. I dont see any investigations going on over that.
“Paying women is not influencing an election”
Why is it not extortion on their part?
No one has said anything about that. And the so-called Federal Attorney for the Southern District of New York hasn’t charged them - how do they walk?
“Paying women is not influencing an election.”
Paying Fusion GPSW to pay some Russians for the dossier is influencing an election. Is that not a violation of campaign laws?
How can you say that? We all know that Stormy Daniels voted for Trump in at least 5 different precincts, right?
/S