If I may, it seems that believing a story about a celebrity is ‘easier’ due simply to observing their life in the spot light which very often includes abuse of drugs and alcohol. As well as their own body of work and their own words which seem to indicate a very liberal anything goes vibe.
It stands to reason that a story about them seems very plausible.
As for Rev Graham, I will speak only for myself in that reading that at the link yesterday was the first I’d ever read even hinting anything of that nature with him. So it is a bit more challenging to buy the story without more evidence.
When you put up the last words of Rev Graham with the suggestion that he was confessing, that was very egregious on your end. You couldn’t possibly know what was in his heart when you made those statements.
It appears that your desire for it to be true with no supporting evidence is in some way going to ‘even the score’, and take some heat off us Catholics.
As a Catholic myself I am personally grateful that the filth is being exposed. It’s long over due and it hurts my heart for the 1000 victims in PA.
I realize it gives a big opening to the conga line of bashes but seriously, they hardly needed this evidence to start bashing. They always have and always will.
I’d worry less about those talking smack and rather put attention on cleaning up our own house. It’s long over due.
And lastly, let’s not try and harm Rev Graham without evidence simply to have an arrow to hit back with. It’s very unbecoming imho.
If as Q says they have everything, I don’t think President Trump would have gone to Graham’s funeral and verbalized what a good man he was.
Anybody can write anything on the internet to ruin someone’s reputation.
Careful. You sound like you can discern my thoughts and motives, and you can’t. It’s also against FR rules. Those here on the thread when Graham died may remember I found his last social media post odd. Look up my old posts and see. To me his post sounded remorseful and it came at a time that Q was posting about allowing people to suicide rather than be exposed.
Other facts that caused me to wonder:
Why would you post that if you knew you were dying? Wouldn’t you post something loving or peaceful or comforting?
Graham was great friends with Bush senior, who we accept as dirty, and Richard Nixon, who we know had a very dirty mouth.
Graham died with an estimated $25 million dollars.
Some people think Watergate was an attempt by Nixon and friends to steal evidence they had abused children.
Fiona Barnett is not the only accuser. Here is another:
https://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2018/02/21/billy-graham-child-abuse/
She also accuses some Catholics. I still investigated because I want the Truth. That makes two very public accusations.
Accusers use surprisingly similar motifs to what Q has used, but years earlier.
I’ve been down this rabbit hole and found enough to wonder some more, that is all. We discuss what we are wondering about here.
Or maybe we don’t. Maybe some of us can’t resist grinding their axe on FRiends...or can’t bear having THEIR sacred cow investigated.
But I think I’ve presented enough facts here to clear myself of the motives you attributed to me...and I think you owe me an apology.
Don’t like the facts I’m posting? Investigate yourself. That’s what FReeQs are supposed to do. Then come back and tell me what you found and we’ll discuss.
But calling abuse just because one doesn’t like the fact/topic is small and petty. I thought we were better than that. The Catholics on this thread are patiently, and sadly, waiting for Q’s proofs. I’m despondent over it...but I’m not stupid, and I’m not closed-minded, and I’m not naïve... I am still following the proof wherever it takes me.