Posted on 08/15/2018 6:42:05 PM PDT by pluvmantelo
I’ll tell you something else that makes me chuckle. You see this article that was just posted:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3679590/posts
Q people read it hours ago. Q linked to it. You have no idea how far behind the times “normal” people are. And you have no idea that many of the big articles posted here were either first called out by Q or noticed by people here who find them on Q research and then post them here on FR.
I always get a chuckle from that. Random Keyboard mashing- my foot!
I’m asking you to explain your statement. What bots? What do you mean by, “confuse the bots?” How exactly do you think these bots work, and why would they be “confused” by a string of random characters?
“Bad news conspiracy theorists. QAnon codes are just a guy mashing his keyboard”
...just what the want us to think.
No offense, but the author of that article, Sara Carter, posted it today at 4:37pm EDT. I'm not a Q person but knew of the article within an hour of the posting.
How much sooner than that did Q link to it? Even before it was posted? If not, then if I as a "normal" person is "far behind the times" after a mere hour, maybe I'm not cut out for the modern era!
“I don’t think amongst is a word.”
It is.
Well, Ann Coulter once said that Bill Clinton was homosexual (not that i am conflating homosexuality with pedophilia)... but she did make this statement to an incredulous media some years ago.
That's an interesting question, but I don't think it is a good question to apply to the Q phenomenon.
You, for example, have NEVER, not one time in your life, NEVER discovered ONE THING, not a single thing, nor have you expressed a single thought, that no one else has discovered, that profoundly changed a signgle significant narrative.
What does that make you?
Pretty much normal.
You are so good at choosing just the right pictures.
“Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?” is what you are saying. Everything you list in favor of the qooks is worthless when weighed against “Trust Sessions!” That’s their rallying cry, and it is DIRECTLY hurting President Trump.
Let me be clear: Anyone saying “Trust Sessions” is against Trump, and as far as I’m concerned, worse than anthem kneelers. Certainly lower. John Brennan territory. Why these turds are allowed to post their disinformation 3x per week on fr is baffling. Traitors to Trump, is what they are.
See tagline.
The thread that Q posts to at 8ch.net is noisy, but much more responsive to breaking news than FR is.
Even if Q is garbage, the thread at 8ch.net is useful.
Thinking there's a huge pedo ring run by the powerful liberal elite is *bat-shit crazy*?
Someone is out to cover their behind. Or someone else's.
OK, so Q linked 15 minutes after Sara posted, and approximately 45 minutes before I saw it.
Given my handicap — I have a JOB and can’t be web surfing 24/7! — I can’t say I’m all that impressed.
If that makes me a “normal” person who is “far behind the times,” then so be it.
P.S. If Q is really “in the know,” then it would have been far better for him to “cue” Sara Carter to this info many, many months ago....
At least 3 hours before it was posted here. I would have posted it here, but sometimes I just feel like why bother. When I see all the insulting comments on a thread like this then I just don’t feel like it. You all have a right to believe what you want. But the insults are rather personal. Just because you don’t believe in the Q narrative does not give you the right to call everyone who does -Nuts, and Kooks, ect....
Here are many more links from today. Most of these are reminders of past events and stories. Not exactly Koolaid:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvTqqYCb-e8
https://mobile.twitter.com/SaraCarterDC/status/1029806224412430336
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/31/cia-admits-spying-senate-staffers
That's not what I said. I linked to it 15 minutes after Sara posted it. You probably saw it before Q posted a link to it. I said Q post came an hour after mine, so later than your view.
-- P.S. If Q is really "in the know," then it would have been far better for him to "cue" Sara Carter to this info many, many months ago... --
Q is posting to the public on 8ch.net, not playing "secret Q" to reporters, at least not that any reporter has disclosed.
Sorry I misunderstood.
Q is posting to the public on 8ch.net, not playing "secret Q" to reporters, at least not that any reporter has disclosed.
What I don't get is, Why not? If he knows "the truth," and presumably wants to get it out, then why via cryptic tidbits, and not in an immensely more efficient way?
Because a thread like this wouldn’t have occurred?
Where did insult anyone? Where did I call anyone "Nuts, and Kooks, etc"?
Yes, insults are rather personal; but so are false accusations!
Not following you. If Q gave his info to reporters directly and in the clear, instead of in tidbits cryptically, and then a reporter posted an article on said info, you really think a thread like this would not appear?
Others have speculated on this subject, and the positive construction is that a public engaged in finding facts independently of the media, or engaged even if using media reports, has the effect of empowering the public to resist media propaganda.
The speculation goes on to posit that engaging the public in a sort of game facilitates this shift of "information power" from the old bastions, to the public.
If the facts came out without the game, without the personal effort, then the people would not gain any ground in this battle to get/hide the truth.
In short, goes the argument, what you see an an efficient way (give the students the answer, no homework), fails to accomplish the mission of empowering the student.
Is it working like that? I don't know. Will it work? My crystal ball never did work, except it pretty reliably coughs up good guesses that end up wrong.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.