I’ve not studied the subject intently enough to determine whether the advocacy rate fits a bell curve model. However, I typically find the pro-Q people outweigh the “non-believers” whenever the subject is broached here on FR. That is anecdotal, but nevertheless disturbing, IMO.
Because, as in this thread, the Q-moonies will SWARM you if you suggest that whoever “Q” may be; if they in fact have any intel at all, the honest and moral thing to do would be to reveal it plainly and identify the perpetrators by name.
You should have seen it coming.
That’s not because most FReepers actually buy into the Q stuff. It’s just that most of them don’t want to bother listening to the abuse that Qultists tend to spew when their pet theory is questioned, so they just avoid the subject.