Your debunking of Q is very Q-like in its vagueness and total lack of clarity about anything.
A. I’m not the source of the debunking information.
B. I’ve linked to the source.
C. I’ve stated that this is a developing story, which by nature can be “vague” at first.
D. I’ve plainly stated that, if you wish to follow such development, you should regularly check the Twitter page of the individual who is posting the story.
None of those statement insist that you officially “follow” this individual, or click on any link he may provide. That would be your choice.
This You Tube video exposes, from the beginning, the involvement of James Brower and Tracy Beanz in the Q LARP, revealing them to be “Q,” or a part of the “Q” entity:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZqMTDLT6akA