[cynwoody]

A cartoonist, who recently met the President for the first time, analyzes Q.

[EasySt]

After watching that...

Go back and watch his videos where he endorsed Hillary.
(and didn’t mean it!)

Then read my post here:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3677795/posts?page=240#240

And ask yourself if Scott thinks all those smart people he’s talking about don’t know anything about confirmation bias, the magic trick and all the other subtle things going on.

Also ask yourself if you think Q is ONLY talking to us good guys, never to any bad guys, and if he might use such tools now and then for good reasons.

If Q is a military Op for us, and against the cabal, would he NOT use any of those tools or techniques?

Keep listening to Scott Adams.

It’s likely to get better.

[AndyJackson]

I discussed this Scott Adams periscope at posts #135

You have to be careful to analyze Scott’s analysis and follow is logic rather than take him at face value that Q is false [whatever that means]. As he says he Jack Pobisiec, and Kurt Schlicter agree that Q is false because of secret information and anonymous sources. Scott Adams tells you, however, that anyone who relies on secret information and anonymous sources is likely a scamster.

So follow Scott’s analysis, which is worth listening to, apply it yourself and come to your own conclusions like the smart puzzle-solver that Scott says Q-followers are.