My point is that an argument over whether Sinaloa is better than Chihuahua is at the same level of idiocy as an argument over Clemson vs. Auburn or Spurs vs. Lakers. The whole thing falls in the category of, “Drunk people get in stupid, sometimes fatal, fights over nonsense.”
Well ok. But I was trying to imagine a US parallel. Michigan vs. Wisconsin? Vermont vs. New Hampshire? And hey, NOBODY can beat Texas, at least till Alaska comes swaggering up. The imagination boggles.
And talking about swaggering, anecdotally “macho” seems to be a Mexican man swagger thing, that was later adopted by Anglos. Pumped with vanity and pride, and separated from the protective-warrior role that is exhorted by classical biblically obedient Christianity.