Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

“The previous plate was actually lying,” said Ondřej Kolář, mayor of the Prague Six municipality, where the monument and Russia’s embassy sit. “When Soviet troops arrived in Prague on 9 May 1945, there was only one SS division here and that was on the outskirts of the city. The Wehrmacht had surrendered to the forces of the Prague uprising, and left the previous day.

“The city was basically free, but that wasn’t something Soviet propaganda wanted to use. We are not denying the role of the Red Army or saying the Soviets didn’t suffer. They suffered a lot – but not in Prague.”

1 posted on 08/08/2018 4:07:54 PM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: CondoleezzaProtege

Prague had been freed in the ‘Prague Uprising’.

German troops negotiated and were able to march to Patton’s army to surrender but were disarmed.

Soviet troops ‘liberated’ Prague on May 9, losing 10 men to SS holdouts.

It wasn’t the Battle of Berlin or Budapest by any means.


2 posted on 08/08/2018 4:37:18 PM PDT by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

Screw the Russians. If the Czechs want to tear down every Soviet era monument, more power to them.


3 posted on 08/08/2018 4:51:46 PM PDT by Kozak (DIVERSITY+PROXIMITY=CONFLICT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CondoleezzaProtege
“The unmistakable change in the appearance of a monument important to preserving the memory of our nation’s heroic struggle against Nazism creates a dangerous precedent,” said Nikolay Bryakin, an embassy spokesman.

Wonder how much he wants to preserve the memory of his nations alliance with the Nazis.

4 posted on 08/08/2018 5:03:34 PM PDT by VR-21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CondoleezzaProtege
“The unmistakable change in the appearance of a monument important to preserving the memory of our nation’s heroic struggle against Nazism creates a dangerous precedent,” said Nikolay Bryakin, an embassy spokesman.

Wonder how much he wants to preserve the memory of his nations alliance with the Nazis.

5 posted on 08/08/2018 5:03:51 PM PDT by VR-21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

Konev was an Russian peasant who was tough as iron, and who rose to become a major Soviet general. He thought nothing of sending tens of thousands of his troops to almost certain death against the Germans. Refined feelings cannot be expected in such a character.


6 posted on 08/08/2018 5:04:46 PM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CondoleezzaProtege
The Red Army never liberated anything.

It raped, it plundered, and it murdered.

And of course, the Soviets occupied and subjugated half of Europe.

But liberated? Never.

8 posted on 08/08/2018 5:16:32 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson