Posted on 08/05/2018 11:52:22 AM PDT by COBOL2Java
So do we know who will be running against the sharia muzzie yet?
There is no living with them, no coexistence.
Ignorant broads...I have met many , the lights are on but no one’s home.
It looks like Laura just told them that only the salad bar was open.
Every Moehammedan Candidate must be directly asked questions such as this.
Do you approve of wife-beating? No?
Well then, do you condemn the Koran and the commands of Moehammed? List chapter and verse.
Yes? Well then. You are NOT a mooselim. Why would you support Sharia Law which demands you be killed as an apostate?
Refuse to condemn the Koran and Moehammed but denounce wife-beating? Then you are practicing taqiyya, and therefore a documented LIAR.
Leftist chicks sure tend to be fat, don’t they?
Tubs of Rocky Road ice cream may be a poor substitute for a man, but then again...I mean, just look at them!
Despite the fact that under Sharia women as viewed as property, sexually and physically abused, subjected to female genital mutilation, forced into arranged marriages, and can be honor killed and stoned to death if they are not modest enough or engage in pre-marital sex, the women who attended El-Sayed’s event remained adamant in defending the barbaric practice of Sharia in Michigan. In fact, one Marxist woman who was screaming in my face said, “It’s their [Muslims] choice” to practice Sharia in the United States if the so wish.
Thanks COBOL2Java.
Same with slavery : Muslims do not speak out against slavery.
” captives of the right hand,” 4:3, 4:24, ..
Traumatic Bonding
Traumatic bonding is “strong emotional ties that develop between two persons where one person intermittently harasses, beats, threatens, abuses, or intimidates the other.” (Dutton & Painter, 1981). Several conditions have been identified that must be present for a traumatic bond to occur.
–(1). There must be an imbalance of power, with one person more in control of key aspects of the relationship, such as setting themselves up as the “authority” through such things as controlling the finances, or making most of the relationship decisions, or using threats and intimidations, so the relationship has become lopsided.
–(2). The abusive behavior is sporadic in nature. It is characterized by intermittent reinforcement, which means there is the alternating of highly intense positives (such as intense kindness or affection) and the negatives of the abusive behavior.
–(3). The victim engages in denial of the abuse for emotional self- protection. In severe abuse (this can be psychological or physical), one form of psychological protection strategy is dissociation, where the victim experiences the abuse as if it is not happening to them, but as if they are outside their body watching the scene unfold (like watching a movie). Dissociative states allow the victim to compartmentalize the abusive aspects of the relationship in order to focus on the positive aspects.
The use of denial and distancing oneself from the abuse are forms of what is called cognitive dissonance. In abusive relationships this means that what is happening to the victim is so horrible, so far removed from their thoughts and expectations of the world, that it is “dissonant” or “out of tune” or “at odds” with their pre-existing expectations and reality. Since the victim feels powerless to change the situation, they rely on emotional strategies to try to make it less dissonant, to try to somehow make it fit. To cope with the contradicting behaviors of the abuser, and to survive the abuse, the person literally has to change how they perceive reality. Studies also show a person is more loyal and committed to a person or situation that is difficult, uncomfortable, or even humiliating, and the more the victim has invested in the relationship, the more they need to justify their position. Cognitive dissonance is a powerful “self-preservation” mechanism which can completely distort and override the truth, with the victim developing a tolerance for the abuse and “normalizing” the abusers behavior, despite evidence to the contrary.
–(4). The victim masks that the abuse is happening, may not have admitted it to anyone, not even themselves.
Trauma bonding makes it easier for a victim to survive within the relationship, but it severely undermines the victims self-structures, undermining their ability to accurately evaluate danger, and impairs their ability to perceive of alternatives to the situation.
Once a trauma bond is established it becomes extremely difficult for the victim to break free of the relationship. The way humans respond to trauma is thought to have a biological basis and reactions to trauma was first described a century ago, with the term “railroad spine” being used. Another term used has been “shell shocked”.
Victims overwhelmed with terror suffer from an overload of their system, and to be able to function they must distort reality. They often shut down emotionally, and sometimes later describe themselves as having felt “robotic”, intellectually knowing what happened, but feeling frozen or numb and unable to take action. A victim must feel safe and out of “survival mode” before they will be able to make cognitive changes.
Many victims feel the compulsion to tell and retell the events of the trauma in an attempt to come to terms with what happened to them and to try to integrate it, reaching out to others for contact, safety, and stability. Other victims react in an opposite manner, withdrawing into a shell of self-imposed isolation. The trauma bond can persist even after the victim leaves the relationship, with it sometimes taking months, or even years, for them to completely break the bond.
• Theft is punishable by amputation of the right hand (above).
• Criticizing or denying any part of the Quran is punishable by death.
• Criticizing Muhammad or denying that he is a prophet is punishable by death.
• Criticizing or denying Allah, the god of Islam is punishable by death.
• A Muslim who becomes a non-Muslim is punishable by death.
• A non-Muslim who leads a Muslim away from Islam is punishable by death.
• A non-Muslim man who marries a Muslim woman is punishable by death.
• A man can marry an infant girl and consummate the marriage when she is 9 years old.
• Girls' clitoris should be cut (Muhammad's words, Book 41, Kitab Al-Adab, Hadith 5251).
• A woman can have 1 husband, who can have up to 4 wives; Muhammad can have more.
• A man can beat his wife for insubordination.
• A man can unilaterally divorce his wife; a woman needs her husband's consent to divorce.
• A divorced wife loses custody of all children over 6 years of age or when they exceed it.
• Testimonies of four male witnesses are required to prove rape against a woman.
• A woman who has been raped cannot testify in court against her rapist(s).
• A woman's testimony in court, allowed in property cases, carries ½ the weight of a man's.
• A female heir inherits half of what a male heir inherits.
• A woman cannot drive a car, as it leads to fitnah (upheaval).
• A woman cannot speak alone to a man who is not her husband or relative.
• Meat to eat must come from animals that have been sacrificed to Allah - i.e., be "Halal".
• Muslims should engage in Taqiyya and lie to non-Muslims to advance Islam.
Sharia law has been advancing in other American institutions
Despite the fact that under Sharia women as viewed as property, sexually and physically abused, subjected to female genital mutilation, forced into arranged marriages, and can be honor killed and stoned to death if they are not modest enough or engage in pre-marital sex, the women who attended El-Sayed’s event remained adamant in defending the barbaric practice of Sharia in Michigan.
Marxist place great almost complete emphasis on their alignment with ideology and politics. The phrase ‘politics in command’ is shorthand for the implementation through political agencies (political parties and elections in bourgeoisie states) of the party program which is , ostensibly grounded in Marxist ideology. Marxists are by definition Materialists with a capital M. All phenomenon are driven by the action of material forces. Supernatural phenomenon have no objective existence but derive from material forces active at the time. Marxist place great emphasis on the elimination of aspects or institutions that are retrograde or based on supernaturalism. The elimination of judicial torture, physical punishments such as flogging or branding for lesser charges and immolation or impalement for capital offenses are ‘progressive’ actions Marxists applaud. How then can anyone styling themselves Marxist embrace a retrograde system of laws and customs contained in the Sharia?
Liberal secularists have been in a culture war against conservative Judeo-Christians for a century.
They look at their long time enemy and imagine a Christian Taliban ready to rise.
They think their moderate Christian neighbors really are going to do what fundamentalist Muslims are doing across the world, imposing theocratic rules on regions, be it Boko Haram in Africa, ISIS in Syria, Al Shabab in Somalia, Aceh in Indonesia, the new Philippines carve out Sharia state their government just approved.
Liberals are willfully blind of Islamic oppression, thinking they’ll all convert to liberal secular if we just love them, educate them, nag them. So they ally with Muslims as the poor little oppressed babies, they can’t do any wrong. Let’s import lots of them because they break up the conservative vote and vote for us.
Liberals are thus bringing a 3-pronged culture war to the West thinking they are importing allies. It helps them to be able to tell the Christian “take down those decorations, don’t play those songs, I’m not against religion, see, this monotheist Muslim agrees with me.”
When Christians are too beaten down to win, liberals’ misplaced compassion causes them to lose. They can’t condemn Muslim rape gangs in the UK or Germany grooming and raping 10-15 year old girls or children born in the EU receiving genital mutilation. They can’t condemn mass sexual assaults (Taharush) or acid attacks to uglify a woman beyond a vague “let’s blame all men”.
They’re so afraid of being called an evil meanie racist that they let little girls get raped and mutilated and adult women raped in public.
The POLICE in EU are more afraid of being called racist than stopping gang rapists of women and girls. They are more afraid of being called bad meanines for criticizing Islam than punishing Shariah law patrols that beat homosexuals and guys going out for bear. The police prefer to arrest critics of Islam and reporters on Muslim rape gangs than deal with acid attacks and Muslim rapists. They’re continuing to defend the foreign culture that erodes the most basic human rights.
They’ve already laid the cultural groundwork for failure of Western civilization and destruction of human rights.
Thanks Chickensoup.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.