Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: topher

“...using a silencer goes too far...”

Please explain how so.


9 posted on 08/05/2018 11:10:23 AM PDT by Paine in the Neck ( Socialism consumes EVERYTHING!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Paine in the Neck
You would only need a device to prevent temporary hearing lose.

You don't need to suppress the noise as much as a silencer.

A person might want to know that his gun was fired -- such as a child firing the handgun.

That was my point. Just something to allow a person to hear after the gun is fired. A silencer would be okay, but knowing a gun is fired might be a desirable thing (as I pointed out above).

A gunowner would be horrified to find a child/person dead because he did not hear the shot of his gun from someone playing with it. And if it has a 'distinctive' sound, the homeowner would know it is his gun being fired...

That is the 'why' for my point of view (which could be total nonsense).

11 posted on 08/05/2018 11:20:20 AM PDT by topher (America, please Do The Right Thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson