Posted on 08/05/2018 9:50:52 AM PDT by BBell
Artistic fraud, anyway.
Cheap paintings only seem to go up in value after the painter dies.........Are you worth $160 million dead?.....Is it worth finding out?...LOL!
LOL! That was my first reaction. I do not like modern art, and very little of impressionism. Give me classic art all the time.
I like Pollock. Not sure why. My old friend/lead-singer, Amy Madigan was in the movie.
LOL. I took a history of art class in college. I don't want to understand it.
That's the premise of a great Wim Wenders' film, The American Friend, staring Dennis Hopper and Bruno Ganz, which is loosely based on Patricia Highsmith's novel, Ripley's Game. Hopper plays Ripley, who makes his money selling "newly discovered" paintings by the late master painter, Anton Kolgash. Kolgash, however, is not actually dead, but living anonymously in an obscure NYC studio pumping out new paintings for Ripley to "discover" every few months, which are then sold to gullible collectors through a German auction house.
Not Hooters!!! A 2 legged cow.
I just looked it up. Sounds good. I do like Dennis Hopper though.
It’s a conquistador on black velvet, but it has style.
She’s got some udders that’s for sure.
It’s ochre, not ogre.
I read of a man who had an unsigned DeKooning painting worth several hundred thousand dollars.
When he wanted to sell it, an art appraiser examined it and concluded it was NOT a DeKoong.
So, it went from a high price piece of art to only the value of the paint and canvas, which proves it is not the quality of the painting, it is the artist who did the painting that gives it value.
Reminds me of Picasso who declared one of his own paintings to be a fake. “I can paint a fake Picasso as well as anyone!”-Picasso
If that thing is worth $160 million, my 9 and 10 year old nieces are going to be RICH!
I wonder what the insurance company paid for that loss.
Seems like the thieves did the museum a favor. Freed up wall space and removed an eyesore too.
A painting is like a joke. If you have to explain it, well, you know.....
Pissarro, not Pizarro. My mistake.
“$160 million for that?”
No kidding. I wouldn’t pay over $50 million for that eyesore!
That puzzled me, too. I was going to make the snarky suggestion that the mystery man stuffed it in a trash container, knowing that the maintenance people would not see anything amiss, and the thieves went through the dumpster later. But since you like the painting, I will withhold the snark.
Perhaps they used the old "duct tape it to the back of another painting" trick, and retrieved it later. I'm sure Maxwell Smart could come up with more.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.