[asinclair]

A journalist should not be a debater. (Unless it's in the context of Point, Counterpoint) By definition, a journalist is required to report both sides of an issue. A little detail that all liberals and not a few conservatives have missed.

Another little detail that whizzes right by the current crop of "reporters" is that the reader/listener should not be able to detect the personal feelings of the reporter. If the reporter is letting his/her opinions through, then it should be in the opinion pages, not the front page. (Radio/TV equivalents apply here.)

And that is why the members of the media who only tell half of the story are "enemies of the state".

[choctaw man]

Best strategy: IGNORE the punk.

[MHGinTN]

Acosta has a twisted liberal mind. It is not possible for him to actually see the other side of the issues he is tasked to promote.

[\/\/ayne]

He would “take the other side” by pretending to be a Hillbilly Nazi and/or Evil Corporation.

[AndyJackson]

enemies of the state

The problem is that they are friends of the [deep] state and therefore enemies of the People.

[gnickgnack2]

And that is why the members of the media who only tell half of the story are “enemies of the state”.

What an astute statement, because if someone is only telling half of the story, you are correct in calling them just a member of the media, NOT a journalist!

[M Kehoe]

If the shtf, the journalists’ body guards would exit the AO post haste.

Not an attempted thread hijack.

5.56mm

[TangoLimaSierra]

He would require a whole new set of gaskets if he ever tried that.

[Political Junkie Too]

Acosta: "What 'other side?'"

-PJ

[WKUHilltopper]

Acosta needs to GTFO of the country.

[Mister Da]

Acosta is not a debater, he’s not a journalist, he’s a propagandist.

[RightGeek]

Can't wait!