Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Moonman62
No, that article says SpaceX claimed it was profitable and the company later yanked that claim off the website after internal docs leaked saying they were bleeding cash and losing money. If SpaceX was profitable, Musk would already have claimed so. And like all of Musks businesses, they would never have existed without government largess
94 posted on 08/03/2018 2:28:45 PM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]


To: rb22982

Well, here’s a quote from the WSJ article that the Motley Fool references, which admits that SpaceX was profitable before their mishaps in 2015 and 2016:

That June 2015 disaster, followed by months of launch delays, contributed to a quarter-billion dollar annual loss and a 6% drop in revenue, after several years of surging sales and small profits.

...

Since the mishap in September of 2016, SpaceX has had a perfect record and they now dominate the global commercial launch market. They save the taxpayers and launch customers a lot of money by driving down launch costs. SpaceX has an estimated private value between $25 billion and $30 billion based on their latest placements.

Corporations have a market value, and while you may disagree with the value of Musk’s companies, he has a long and successful record of creating companies that are highly profitable for investors. That includes Zip2, Paypal, TSLA, and SpaceX. And in the future probably the Boring Company.


154 posted on 08/03/2018 7:13:49 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Give a man a fish and he'll be a Democrat. Teach a man to fish and he'll be a responsible citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson