1. Because of the NYPD SOURCED public assertions within 24-48 hours of the first major event about Weiner’s arrest/laptop.
2. Those same initial assertions were quickly removed, buried, denied, squelched, removed. That immediately said to me they were accurate.
3. I felt in my spirit that the assertions as horrible as they were—that they were the tip of the iceberg and solidly true.
repeating an assertion doesn’t answer the questions I have posed.
When\what date was the first major event about Weiner’s laptop\arrest ?”
I don’t take any issue with the contents of weiners laptop. I take issue that NYPD has any role in this.
Riddle me this:
It there were NYPD SOURCED public assertions and they were removed ( completely ? from the entire world wide web ? ) how do YOU know they even existed ? Did you see them ? with quotes from named NYPD sources ?
Here is the True Pundit story - please note if there is any concrete sourceable info in it.
Heres Princes interview 2 days later - please note if there is any concrete sourceable info in it - see if anything matches True Pundit report?.
https://www.breitbart.com/radio/2016/11/04/erik-prince-nypd-ready-make-arrests-weiner-case/