Still, what you are telling me isn't plausible based on the evidence that's available.
I still ain't buying 50 chiefs saw the contents ? ... from where ? which boroughs ? ....it doesn't pass the laff test.
Did they pass around the laptop ?
everyone who cites “proof” uses the True Pundit story, which has no proof it in.
https://truepundit.com/breaking-bombshell-nypd-blows-whistle-on-new-hillary-emails-money-laundering-sex-crimes-with-children-child-exploitation-pay-to-play-perjury/
The IG report cites anybody who had anything to do with the Weiner laptop\devices - not one mention of NYPD. Read Chapter Nine
https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download
9/26/2016 - a warrant was gotten by the FEDS - not NYPD - to seize Weiner’s devices. He voluntarily turned them in to Granite Intelligence LLC. Here's the Post report and the warrant.
https://nypost.com/2018/05/17/search-warrant-for-weiners-electronic-devices-unsealed/
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4465430-WEINER-Search-Warrant-2016.html#document/
10/30/2016 - a warrant gotten by the FEDS to search the emails. The laptop is already in the Feds possession.
https://cryptome.org/2016/12/abedin-013.pdf
I haven't been able to find:
1. A NYPD warrant to seize Weiner’s laptop
2. When exactly did NYPD seize the laptop
now a new one
3. As of now I haven't been able to find Schneiderman’s order.
What's the NY AG doing in a supposed NYPD case ?
Nothing you are telling helps.
Right now, I still think True Pundit and Erik Prince are full of sanitary canal water when it comes to the NYPD and NYPD quotes.
I will continue to kick over rocks to see what's underneath.
Thanks again.
Shocking evidence of such criminality has been found on ex-congressman Anthony Weiner’s laptop computer, claim the sources, which was seized from him by NYC officials investigating his allegedly having sent sexually explicit texts to a 15-year-old girl. (from The New American)
It was my impression that the ‘big meeting’ at NYPD HQ was a general meeting for presenting law enforcement priorities throughout the City and was not called solely to discuss Weiner. It was my impression that Weiner was presented in the context of a more general discussion of pedophilia and sexting.
What I guessed is that in the aftermath that among several presentations to the Chiefs, that some of the findings on the Weiner laptop were horrific and caused a lot of rumbling in the room.
As for the custody of the contents, it’s important to keep in mind there were two investigations, a state investigation into Weiner’s pedophilia and a federal investigation into Clinton’s emails. Feinstein said Congress was aware that the FBI had seized Weiner’s laptop and devices but it was not sure where the laptop was. To me that says it was likely Feinstein called the FBI field office in NYC and asked about the laptop only to be told “it’s not here”. In turn, that tells me they left it with NYPD after they got what they needed.
NY Times 10/28/2016 - Emails in Anthony Weiner Inquiry Jolt Hillary Clinton’s Campaign
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/29/us/politics/fbi-hillary-clinton-email.html
The FBI seized Weiner’s laptop and devices. My take is FBI copied the emails and gave the laptop to NYPD for their investigation of the pedophilia. This is supported by the FBI letter that Q posts a link to which has the FBI in possession of DVDs. It would be reasonable to think FBI seized Weiner’s laptop, copied Clinton emails and files to DVDs and left the laptop with NYPD who accompanied FBI in the raid of Weiner’s home.
http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/JW-v.-DOJ-02046-Hillary-R.-Clinton-Part-24-of-24.pdf
I think that’s about all we are going to know at this time.
As for your comments of “not buying it”. There is nothing to buy. There are only bits and pieces to weave together into a summary that makes sense and fits what is known. No one in the public realm is going to know the full story until it’s released which may be never.