it’s not that I think we couldn’t or haven’t developed it.
it’s more that we really don’t need it we have warships and aircraft and even personal with anti aircraft capabilities already and stationed worldwide.
a sub being able to shoot down an aircraft near it is practical
a sub needing a missile to shoot down an aircraft halfway around the world is impractical especially when you can more easily use a different asset in already place
Ok.
But it was fighter jets that shot down the missile and the missile was launched from Whidbey so I’m not sure how subs enter the thinking. Trident missiles can be launched from land as well.
We can’t really draw anything from it.
The best we can say is that TWO incidents have occurred which are improbable. The best we can make of it is that something nefarious is going on and we don’t know much of the details.
Q is trying to reveal there is a real war, not a game, going on. But Q is not giving details and by not giving details only adds to Q’s cred because if there were more details, I would back out of following Q. Revealing too many details would indicate Q is violating OpSec.