[Hostage]

I observe you’re drawn a conclusion from facts, some of which might be in error or are sketchy or incomplete.

I am not saying you are wrong, I just don’t see how you arrive at such a conclusion with facts that may be incomplete.

For example, Trump is reported to have arrived in Singapore at 8:20 pm. You say the missile was fired at 7 pm Singapore time. These times I do not contest.

But you say AF1 “was no where near Washington state he was already in Singapore less than an hour after.”

Missiles can have a range of 10,000km range and travel that in a half hour.

Further, such missiles will usually travel on polar trajectories.

So I’m just not connecting how you arrive at your conclusion so confidently without having all the facts.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3675845/posts?page=974#974

[edzo4]

explain the differences between a surface to air anti- aircraft missile and an intercontinental ballistic missile...