Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Brian Griffin

If it REPLACES the income tax I am all for it.


6 posted on 08/01/2018 12:09:31 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: central_va

What would actually help is keeping the tariffs in place while repealing the Sixteenth Amendment utterly.

Of course, the “programs” that the federal government assumed control of solely as an exercise of power would have to go back to the private sector.


15 posted on 08/01/2018 12:12:41 PM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: central_va

It’s a tax on your past income. And it could be imposed as often as a gov’t wished.

We have had a Funded Public Debt ever since Alexander Hamilton was the first Treasury Secretary- he set up the system, which stabilized the shaky finances of the United States and saved the dollar from the oblivion it suffered under the Articles of Confederation gov’t .

As long as the debt service is a manageable percent of the GDP there is no good reason to pay it off. There was a sinking fund for paying it off in early administrations but when it was paid off the country went into recession.

Investors like the guaranteed return on Treasury paper, which is what the national debt is composed of. Insurance companies and retirement guarantors own a very large amount of Treasury paper in order to fund their operations.


29 posted on 08/01/2018 12:23:36 PM PDT by Pelham (California, Mexico's socialist colony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson