Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: No_Doll_i
Excellent point, No Doll. They both know.

The fact that an unidentifiable pic was posted by Q, makes sense on two levels. He can't be accused of blatant spying and outing somebody, and if toup man was one of ours captured by "feed" by our guys and taken by bad guys, don't wanna give up the i.d. of one of our guys.

Still a puzzlement.

Fixin' to go to press and will neutrally report what I got. I will take no editorial stance at this point. All of yhou have great arguments, I have to say.

Such smart FReeQs and such open, inquiring minds.

Bagster


802 posted on 07/30/2018 8:31:28 PM PDT by bagster ( "Even bad men love their mamas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 799 | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote; StormFlag; TEXOKIE; CPT Clay; buffaloguy; grey_whiskers; Wingy; bitt; Shady; ...
A great day of Q, with some of the best stuff being saved for last. There are some good riddles, some of which haven't been totally decided on. Let's see what stories are being "tracked" as Q would say.

  • The Donald announces he is willing to meet with the President and head raggedy man of [Iran], just like Obama said he would do. And so the "art of the deal" begins. Stand aside, dems, daddy's working.

  • The star of "The Walking Dead," Ruth Buzzi Ginsburg, says she wants to serve five more years on the Supreme Court. You know, till after Trump is out of office. Ruthie, your math is bad. P.S; you're not gonna make it, dear.

  • Here's an interesting one that slipped under the radar. Remember how Susan Rice and The Osuckas are now working with Netflix? Well guess who just got a documentary. Louis Farrakahn. Hahahaha. Go figure.

    netflix-offers-anti-semite-homophobe-farrakhan-documentary-starting-august-1st

  • Fires rage in California. Q will speak on this one.

  • Late at night, a huge bomb was dropped by FReeQ StevenW. Apparently, the CIA, headed by Gina Haspel, "dropped" a document about a book called, "Bloodlines of the Illuminati" by a Fritz Springmeier (1995).

    Rather than try to explain what it says, I'll post the link to the post so you can read it. If, in fact, this was "dropped" by the actual CIA, then it legitimizes a lot of speculation and so called "conspiracy theories" that people have been talking about.

    have a look. This has the potential to be the biggest BOOM of all times, should it prove to be legitimate.

    Let's do Q.

#1762

Here's this, by Q.

What happens when CA is in serious debt and lost priority aid from the FED gov due to sanctuary status (illegal)?
Light fires.
Declare State of Emergency and req billions from FED.
Why did POTUS reject in the past?
Sick people!
The more you know.

Justice Dept. sues California over ‘sanctuary’ laws that aid those in U.S. illegally

the-top-four-reasons-california-is-unsustainable

However, like many good economic stories, government policies threaten its future.

local/lanow/la-me-california-wildfire-funds-20171119-story.

California lawmakers had asked the White House for $7.4 billion to help residents recover from the wildfires that began in early October...

These stories speak for themselves. 7.4 BILLION dollars? Because the enviro-whacko California socialist government and EPA make it illegal to prevent fires and build a water infrastructure? Not to mention to control illegal aliens and support anti-terrorist actions? And that's not to even mention the intentional setting of fires to manipulate federal funds.

All this contributes to California trying to replace Federal funds lost due to anti-Constitutional behavior with fundage for fire victims. Enough is enough. Take care of yourself, Socialists, and stop sucking the blood of the host animal.

Don't get me started. I live here.

#1763

Here Q goes,

Those you are taught to TRUST the most…..

Australian bishop convicted of sex abuse cover-up resigns

After decades of silence, nuns talk about abuse by priests

Project Safe Childhood

Dark to LIGHT.

Q has talked about "those who (we) are taught to trust the most." Here are some examples, the third link being a report from the Justice Department on child abuse.

#1764

A long one,

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/icotr/51117/2016_Cert_FISC_Memo_Opin_Order_Apr_2017.pdf

>Nicholas Rasmussen (IMPORTANT name to remember)
>Former Director of NCTC

mccaininstitute.org/staff/nicholas-rasmussen

Think FISA.
Think NO NAME.
WH visitor logs: NO NAME/HUSSEIN (dates?)
WH visitor logs: NO NAME/BRENNAN/HUSSEIN (dates?)
WH visitor logs: NO NAME/BRENNAN/COMEY/HUSSEIN (dates?)
WH visitor logs: NO NAME/BRENNAN/CLAPPER/RICE/HUSSEIN
(dates?)
Replaced by:

nctc-who-we-are/director-nctc

>Defense Intelligence Liaison to British Intelligence in London
Think UK.
Current Director of the C_A.

/about-cia/leadership/gina-haspel

(UK bio removed)
>CIA's station chief London, UK
"Furthermore, Haspel is seen as a Russia expert and a close ally of Britain’s MI6, having being London station chief from 2014 to 2017."

gina-haspel-cia-director-atone-past

The more you know.

Q seems to be telling us that Nicholas Rasmussen, (an IMPORTANT name to remember) was the head of the NCTC (National Counter Terrorism Center) and was replaced by Russel Travers. Rasmussen is now the senior director of the McCain Institute’s Counterterrorism Program.

Travers had been previously assigned as Defense Intelligence Liaison to British Intelligence in London and also worked on Wikileaks investigations.

Q wants us to think of the FISA report and White House meetings between John McCain and Obama, Brennan, Comey, Rice, and Clapper.

And then Q mentions the current head of the CIA who also was assigned to the UK and was considered a Russia expert, Gina Haspel.

This is all tying together nicely and looks to be the outline of a grand conspiracy that goes all the way up to Obama. Gina Haspell and this new NCTC guy must have the dirt on Rasmussen and all the other co-conspirators listed by Q.

If what they know regarding McCain's/UK/MI6 stuff comes out, and it leads to the Obamaites Q listed, it's gonna be beyond BOOMage.

And, as we know, they have it all. Let's hope Haspell and Travers are white hats. I think they must be, but one never quite knows, does one?

#1765

Okay, back to the toupeed walking dude from last night. An anon asks,

MA Office | The 'Feed'
Did anons get the wrong angle on this?

The anon goes on to speculate that the toupeed man was pne of Q's operators who had just taken the Avenatti building photo and that the people in the car taking the picture of him were Avenatti's people or deep state surveillers of some kind. And that Q, who has it all, "ripped" the photo from their phone.

It seems a decent enough theory, and there are those who are on that team in FReeQville. Q says this about it.

Who supplied the FEED?
SA.
CF.
We have it all.
U-Access KILLS.
[spook]

It appears that Q is denying the anon's theory, and indicating that "FEED" is as originally thought, that the "feed" is from SA and CF, if SA stands for Saudi Arabia and CF stands for the Clinton Foundation.

There is evidence to suggest that Avenatti was put on the Stormy Daniels case, and paid, by Al-Waleed and perhaps some others of the Saudi Royal family, before they were taken out of power. And he may have ties to the Clinton machine.

Many FReeqs are on board with the anon's way of thinking and the Oracle is maintaining editorial nuetrality in the matter. Though I am leaning toward the Q interpretaion I've just described.

Some suggestions as to what "U-access" means are "Universal," Unauthorized," "Unclassified," and "Uranium 1."

U-access KILLS also had several interpretations, but no consensus. TBD, as a famous FReeQ would say.

#1766

Right on schedule.

avenatti-targeted-in-person-by-qanon-the-crazy-pro-trump-conspiracy-theory

The article claims that Avenatti is being targeted by a "crazy conspiracy theory" that's crazy and doesn't exist and is fake and stuff. So why complain if it's crazy? By the way, it doesn't seem crazy to me. But this is the Daily Beast, after all. The truth has to seem crazy to them.

#1767

Here we go.

qanon-4chan-rightwing-conspiracy-theory-explained-trump

The sprawling internet theory, beloved by Trump supporters, has ensnared everyone from Tom Hanks to Hillary Clinton.

Again, the "crazy conspiracy theory" that doesnt exist is going after the "beloved" Tom Hanks and the misunderstood Hillary Clinton. How can this be? Qanon isn't even real. Why so much ink?

And besides, what makes Tom Hanks "beloved." Because he's an actor?

Is it my imagination or are there more and more Qanon stories in the media every day. This story is getting perilously close to the mainstream media. Just go ahead and ask, guys. I dare ya.

#1768

An anon posts a long list of news stories about how fake Qanon is. He says this,

LOOK who's writing about Q in the 10 latest news articles about Qanon.

They are pushing the pizzagate / accusing actors of pedophilia angle.
they're skeeeeeerrrrd

Q makes no comment and allows this post to stand as the message. It seems to me that a large proportion of the articles are directed at YouTube and may be an attempt to squash any mention of this "crazy consopiracy theory" from YouTube. Kinda like NBC did with the Apple Qanon app.

#1769

Q refers to the previous post (by number) and says this,

Feel proud Autists, Anons, and Patriots.
You did this!
You are taking back control.
You have the power.
Stay the course.

Q is telling the anons, and us (he said proudly) that because of whatever noise they are making on the internet and elsewhere, that we are responsible for the rash of media attention that Qanon is getting. We ARE taking back control. We DO have the power. And we WILL stay the course.

#1770

Obvious MSM coordination?
Independent?
POTUS coordinated attacks.
Q coordinated attacks.
Who/what else is under coordinated attack by the MSM?
Logical thinking.
What do they know?
Why won’t they ask the obvious question?
All for a conspiracy?
Enjoy the show.

Q points out the obvious coordinated attacks against Trump and Qanon. He wants us to think about other coordinated attacks against individuals and otherwise.

What do they know? They know that Q and Trump and WE know. That's what they know. They must stop the message at all costs. That's why they dont ask the obvious question.

#1771

An anon writes a very Billyv-like post (He must be their laundry and morale officer.). He wonders why the don't ask anons why they are doing what they are doing. He explains why they aren't a "cult" but are just looking for truth. Q responds,

Excellent!
You cannot fool a massive group of dedicated gold star researchers.
At what point does it become mathematically impossible?
Comms structure designed for a very specific reason.

Q lets the anons know why he chose them as his vehicle.

#1772

joshua-adam-schulte-charged-unauthorized-disclosure-classified-information-and-other

Tracking?
Unsealed indictment.

...announced today that JOSHUA ADAM SCHULTE was charged in a 13-count Superseding Indictment (the “Indictment”) in connection with his alleged theft of classified national defense information from the Central Intelligence Agency (“CIA”)...

This is a big one. FReeQs said that this guy "stole" CIA information, some said Weiner laptop data, and was attempting to leak it to Wikileaks, but was caught. He was arrested and found to be in possession of a ton of child porn. Was it planted? The defendant says it was. But the CIA would never do such a thing. Right?

Q is saying that this indictment was "unsealed". Q asks, "Tracking?" which sounds like he's asking us and the anons if they are tracking unsealed indictments. You know, for like Jack Black's scorecard or something.

#1773

And on a related note, an Anon posts a graphic about Vault 7, the largest ever publication of CIA documents. The anon points to the date of the publication, March 7, 2017.

Q says of this,

Track last.
JA offline cause.

I get the feeling, but haven't seen it in writing, that the CIA got pissed when wikileaks dumped this stuff and made sure that Assange [JA] was "taken off line" on or around March 7, 2017. Just a hunch. Surely some edzo, or TEXOKIE, or No Dollher type researcher can check into that.

Could this also be related to the guy in the earlier post? Better FReeQs than I will find out.

So some good stuff came out today. The media is boiling over and the big reveal seems imminent. Avenatti is about to snap and FISA looms large. What will tomorrow bring.

Hurry back FReeQs. The storm is heating up. See ya ‘round the popsicle stand. Same Q time. Same Q channel.

Bagster


897 posted on 07/31/2018 3:30:58 AM PDT by bagster ( "Even bad men love their mamas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 802 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson