Replies

NEW Q

#1753

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 58456f No.2340517
Jul 29 2018 13:53:05 (EST)

Foundation.
Bottom to top.
Layers.
FISA = Foundation.
Start.
People are more aware of current events.
Establish link.
Think criminal/illegal act(s) to prevent/overturn Presidential election of POTUS.
Public awareness.
Evidence introduced.
MSM covert link.
Think Sessions open statement re: leak investigations.
How do you build a home?
Foundation to structure (layers).
Huber.
Layers (U1, Iran, Human Traffic, Haiti, Corruption, etc etc).
Logical thinking.
Q

_________________________________________________________

I think this new post falls in line with the theory that Giuliani and his Rico experience was brought in to tie everything all together in one big criminal conspiracy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racketeer_Influenced_and_Corrupt_Organizations_Act#Application_of_RICO_laws

Under RICO, a person who has committed “at least two acts of racketeering activity” drawn from a list of 35 crimes—27 federal crimes and 8 state crimes—within a 10-year period can be charged with racketeering if such acts are related in one of four specified ways to an “enterprise”.[citation needed] Those found guilty of racketeering can be fined up to $25,000 and sentenced to 20 years in prison per racketeering count.In addition, the racketeer must forfeit all ill-gotten gains and interest in any business gained through a pattern of “racketeering activity.”

When the U.S. Attorney decides to indict someone under RICO, they have the option of seeking a pre-trial restraining order or injunction to temporarily seize a defendant’s assets and prevent the transfer of potentially forfeitable property, as well as require the defendant to put up a performance bond. This provision was placed in the law because the owners of Mafia-related shell corporations often absconded with the assets. An injunction and/or performance bond ensures that there is something to seize in the event of a guilty verdict.

In many cases, the threat of a RICO indictment can force defendants to plead guilty to lesser charges, in part because the seizure of assets would make it difficult to pay a defense attorney. Despite its harsh provisions, a RICO-related charge is considered easy to prove in court since it focuses on patterns of behavior as opposed to criminal acts.

RICO also permits a private individual “damaged in his business or property” by a “racketeer” to file a civil suit. The plaintiff must prove the existence of an “enterprise”. The defendant(s) are not the enterprise; in other words, the defendant(s) and the enterprise are not one and the same. There must be one of four specified relationships between the defendant(s) and the enterprise: either the defendant(s) invested the proceeds of the pattern of racketeering activity into the enterprise (18 U.S.C. § 1962(a)); or the defendant(s) acquired or maintained an interest in, or control of, the enterprise through the pattern of racketeering activity (subsection (b)); or the defendant(s) conducted or participated in the affairs of the enterprise “through” the pattern of racketeering activity (subsection (c)); or the defendant(s) conspired to do one of the above (subsection (d)). In essence, the enterprise is either the ‘prize,’ ‘instrument,’ ‘victim,’ or ‘perpetrator’ of the racketeers. A civil RICO action can be filed in state or federal court.

Dis,

Your conclusion about Rosenstein and the FISA application makes sense and is key.

Doll,

The critical line is, "MSM covert link."

Yesterday, Trump met with the editor and publisher of the New York Times. Ostensibly the meeting was about their fears that Trump's rash and intemperate words were a danger to the First Amendment and to the lives of journalists. I think Trump responded as follows:

"Gentlemen, here is a folder of transcripts of contacts between your journalists and CIA Mockingbird personnel conducted at 4 AM almost daily via burner phones. These transcripts won't leave this office, but take a few minutes to read them and see how your newspaper is not only printing fake news, but is engaging in sedition and possibly treason."

"Now that you see what is going on under your very noses, you need to know that news will soon be coming out linking the Clinton Foundation, the Hillary Clinton campaign, the Democratic Party and former president Obama to crimes beyond imagining. The FBI, CIA and other federal agencies will be implicated. We're talking obstruction of justice, financial corruption, child trafficking, sedition and treason. When this happens, you will have a choice to make. You can continue covering up for these people and printing the fake news that Mockingbird sends you at 4 AM -- or you can recover your reputation as America's newspaper of record. Just keep in mind that people are going to prison and reputations will be ruined. The choice is yours."

I think that this is how the pieces are going to fit together.