It is indeed privileged. It should have required a court order to get their filthy claws on it.
Which, of course, would have meant a hearing in front of a political hack of a judge who would grant the governments request.
And, thus, we have come full circle.
It is indeed privileged. It should have required a court order to get their filthy claws on it.
Which, of course, would have meant a hearing in front of a political hack of a judge who would grant the governments request.
And, thus, we have come full circle.
________________________
So a court order can demand that a lawyer betray his client?