1 posted on
07/23/2018 10:36:07 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
2 posted on
07/23/2018 10:38:03 AM PDT by
logi_cal869
(-cynicus-)
To: BenLurkin
So much for that “It’s A-L-I-V-E !” rush.
3 posted on
07/23/2018 10:45:19 AM PDT by
Aevery_Freeman
(Idiocracy is Prophecy!)
To: BenLurkin
As the article points out: new technology will inevitably have some negative side effects—and it’s better to figure them out now, before trying to gene edit living humans.
5 posted on
07/23/2018 10:53:04 AM PDT by
erlayman
(yw)
To: BenLurkin
Computing didn't really take off until we got home computers. It's the same thing with this technology. It won't become really useful until we all have the tools to go in and edit God's own object code. Then we'll see biotechnology really advance.
(/sarc)
To: BenLurkin
There is a reason why for critical work such as CAR-T therapy Crispr isn’t used for editing, even though it’s simple. It hasn’t been fully tested for safety. TALEN is still the preferred way.
7 posted on
07/23/2018 11:07:08 AM PDT by
libh8er
To: BenLurkin
This is what happens when “scientists” think they understand how it all works.
The holy grail is changing those pesky XY and XX chromosomes so they can get points with the tranny crowd.
8 posted on
07/23/2018 11:07:41 AM PDT by
I want the USA back
(This week's hysterical obsession: Trump tweet on iranian threat. Last week's: Trump Putin's Bitch.)
To: BenLurkin
Dr. Frankenstein is not amused.
10 posted on
07/23/2018 1:18:43 PM PDT by
Vaduz
(women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson