Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Hostage

My puzzle is that Thighness is clearly not Paperclip (relative to Bushes), but pure Chicago malevolence from her mob father, so how did Zero/ValJar’s Chicago schmaltz beat her up so bad in ‘08? Did these demons actually have an ideological schism? Rush’s Operation Chaos - I was apoplectic, aneuristic when he launched it - what did he see then, that I still can’t see now?


1,042 posted on 07/24/2018 10:21:58 PM PDT by txhurl (World War Q..... next stop: ....what IS the next stop? Carter's Iran.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1037 | View Replies ]


To: txhurl

To slow walk a totalitarian control governance into the lives of most Americans, it is well-known that healthcare must be controlled. To control a population, one must control its healthcare.

Hillary in 2008 was not going to be able to lead the effort to nationalize healthcare. She had already failed in 1993-1994. Her appearance would remind Congress of her dismal failure from years past. The Democracy Alliance, a secret network of democrat billionaires, decided that Hillary would sit this one out and get her shot in 2016. They wanted Obama as their tool.

Obama is not really all that smart. He was and is a puppet. He was just following orders, and so was Hillary. Hillary really did think she was going to win. Q keeps repeating their mistake was in never thinking she would lose.

In a military campaign, a downside is planned for just as is an upside. Sometimes strategic retreats are employed to win a war (General Nathanael Greene of the Southern American Army in the Revolutionary war). Hillary’s campaign never planned that she would lose, they never thought she would lose. Peter Strzok thought of having an ‘insurance policy’ which was to get dirt on Trump so that he could quickly be defeated in an October surprise or quickly impeached if the unthinkable happened. But the Hillary Camp never embraced planning for the downside.

Any good lawyer will plan for the downside as well as the upside. Most often, a client only wants to hear and discuss the upside and will want to ignore the downside.

The problem with Hillary is that she actually thought she was really the smartest woman in the world. And her staff, their attitudes, their priorities, all reflected Hillary’s megalomania.

The money and brains of the democrat party got behind Obama and he was their useful tool, their puppet. To them, Obama was a much better actor playing the role for which they had written the script. Hillary was always confrontational, always confronting any male that challenged her female superiority. The money and brains of their party cut a deal with Hillary that Obama would go first with the healthcare takeover and Hillary would follow to ensure single payer was implemented.

It wasn’t Obama that defeated Hillary in 2008. It was a higher level agreement that was put into place.


1,058 posted on 07/24/2018 10:55:57 PM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1042 | View Replies ]

To: txhurl

Rush is still fond of the Bushes, special place in his heart or something like that about 2-4 weeks ago. Helping HRC with Op Chaos helped them?


1,118 posted on 07/25/2018 5:30:45 AM PDT by smileyface (Things looking up in RED PA! I love President Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1042 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson