Posted on 07/20/2018 1:56:57 PM PDT by CedarDave
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponents Argument
Major constitutional problems imo with unconstitutional federal government interference in INTRAstate schooling are as follows, this list not necessarily complete.
First, consider that President Thomas Jefferson had officially clarified that the states would first need to amend the Constitution to expressly give Congress the specific power to regulate, tax, spend, and otherwise stick its big nose into the affairs of intrastate schools, the states having never amended the Constitution for this purpose.
"Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States."Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added]. United States v. Butler, 1936.
Regarding the post-17th Amendment ratification career lawmakers making themselves the national sex equality police without the constitutionally required consent of the states, note that the only constitutionally express power that the states have actually given to the feds to deal with sex-related intrastate issues is voting rights, evidenced by the 19th Amendment.
19th Amendment:
"The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation [emphasis added]."
"Our Constitution never conferred upon the Congress of the United States the power - sacred as life is, first as it is before all other rights which pertain to man on this side of the grave - to protect it in time of peace by the terrors of the penal code within organized states; and Congress has never attempted to do it. There never was a law upon the United States statute-book to punish the murderer for taking away in time of peace the life of the noblest, and the most unoffending, as well, of your citizens, within the limits of any State of the Union. The protection of the citizen in that respect was left to the respective States, and there the power is to-day [emphasis added]. Rep. John Bingham, Congressional Globe. (See bottom half of third column.)
So by replying how high when the unconstitutionally big federal government shouts jump, the constitutionally low-information University of New Mexico Board of Regents is unthinkingly helping to expand the already unconstitutionally big federal governments powers imo.
If the threat of the loss of federal funding played into the boards decision then the board doesnt seem to understand the following. Any federal funding is arguably stolen state revenues, such revenues stolen by unconstitutional federal taxes according to the Gibbons v. Ogden excerpt above.
NM and the rest of the states need to eliminate the unconstitutional middleman, the unconstitutionally big federal government, from helping the states to manage their revenues.
Remember in November!
Patriots need to elect a Congress that will support Pres. Trumps vision for MAGA.
The article details cuts/gains to each program. In sum the total changes:
Men cut: From 311 to 234
Women gain: from 259 to 313
(My comment: Insanity!!)
They actually play at a commercial venue Lucky 66 Bowl in the North Valley, a combination bowling alley, beach volley ball court, and karaoke bar.
And people wonder why Breaking Bad was filmed here.
The Journal reported in a Tweet a couple of hours ago that Utah has already announced the hiring of 21-year Lobo ski team coach (11 as head coach) Fredrik Landstedt.
dang
Yep. The government continues to jam a square peg into a round hole.
Thanks for your analysis. The only positive I can see in this is that the people I have talked to today see the impact of Title IX as unfair. Maybe this will make them think a bit of how the Feds control local affairs and how the outcome is so much worse than what was intended.
Look at the numbers posted in my #23. Men achievers are being penalized in favor of women who may not even be interested in participating in some of the sports gaining additional places:
Men Track and Field:*
Indoor will go from a roster of 31 to 20
Outdoor will go from a roster of 32 to 20
Cross country will go from a roster of 16 to 10
(* some compete in all three sports)
Women Track and Field*:
- Indoor track will go from 43 to 65
- Outdoor track will go from 43 to 65
- Cross country will go from 20 to 39
(*Some athletes compete in all 3 sports)
Oh boo hoo. The media were so beside themselves yesterday over UNM athletic budget cuts that if you had tuned in to the middle of their broadcasts you would have thought two fully fueled airliners flew into the world trade center. Here’s a thought, focus on academics, clean up that filthy campus rife with homeless, and add adequate parking.
Exactly. In these times of enlightenment of transgender acceptance, Title IX should be a thing of the past.
They cut women’s beach volleyball? It is blatantly sexist to deprive men of the opportunity to watch this sport.
I hope the transgender badminton team is safe.
Thanks.
Time for all the men cut to go trans-gender !
They should get some men to identify as women and create a few more “women’s teams”. They’ll be able to keep the balance demanded by Title ix and probably pick up a few national championships until other schools figure it out and give them competition.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.