Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sunken Russian Warship Rumored to Contain 200 Tons of Gold Discovered Near South Korea
Gizmodo ^ | 19 Jul, 2018 | George Dvorsky

Posted on 07/20/2018 9:24:52 AM PDT by MtnClimber

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: MtnClimber; Gamecock; SaveFerris; FredZarguna; PROCON; Army Air Corps; KC_Lion; CopperTop
The wreck of the Dmitrii Donskoi

I think Gordonski Lightfootski sang about that.

41 posted on 07/20/2018 5:24:19 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1
Yes, you're wrong! Let us send you our brouchure, "Gold Math for Dummies"!


42 posted on 07/20/2018 5:52:45 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound
200 tons of gold stacked in solid ingots would occupy a space only 3 feet high by 6 feet wide by 16 feet long.

That aint a whole lot of space in the hold of a ship.

By contrast, the 1600 tons of coal would occupy a volume 120 times larger. If they wanted to move it that way, they could easily have found space for the gold. (For example, just by leaving <1% of the coal behind...)

43 posted on 07/21/2018 12:08:45 AM PDT by FredZarguna (And what Rough Beast, its hour come round at last, slouches toward 5th Avenue to be born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1
Your math is correct.

Alternatively, $39,350.91/kg * 200 * 1000 kg/metric ton = $7.87 bn.

A lot of problematic calculations in the article, including the claim there might not have been room for the gold in the hold. The 1600 tons of coal alone occupy a space at least 120 times larger (that's if it was solid anthracite, and more likely the space required would be 150 times larger in reality.)

44 posted on 07/21/2018 12:14:50 AM PDT by FredZarguna (And what Rough Beast, its hour come round at last, slouches toward 5th Avenue to be born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Go_Raiders; DCBryan1
Actually the amount of gold quoted is 200 tons. That's a number with one significant digit, so Troy vs. Avoirdupois ounces is a false precision. (In fact, I'd be surprised if there's even ONE significant digit in the amount quoted.)

The point being lost is the article laughably claims 200 tons is worth $133 Bn.

45 posted on 07/21/2018 12:21:40 AM PDT by FredZarguna (And what Rough Beast, its hour come round at last, slouches toward 5th Avenue to be born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido
You forgot the patronymic.

His full name is Gordonski Sundownubeddertakekarovich Lightfootski.

46 posted on 07/21/2018 12:24:37 AM PDT by FredZarguna (And what Rough Beast, its hour come round at last, slouches toward 5th Avenue to be born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna

Significant digits is a very good point. I’m usually more of a stickler on them. Thanks for the slap to the forehead!


47 posted on 07/21/2018 10:25:42 PM PDT by Go_Raiders (The fact is, we really don't know anything. It's all guesswork and rationalization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson