Are these so called reporters naturally stupid, or do they have to work at it?
Are these so called reporters naturally stupid, or do they have to work at it?"
--------------
The reporter is doing the RIGHT thing in mot prejudging the accused. MAYBE there is an explanation for the chemicals being in his possession? Leave it to the prosecutor to convince a jury; it's not the job of a reporter to do that.
They reported the facts without reaching a conclusion on guilt or innocence. We should encourage that in a reporter.