Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: LibWhacker
a printed copper thrust chamber successfully completed a series of hotfire tests...

That info leads to more questions. I believe copper melts well below rocket exhaust temperatures. The thrust chamber, whatever they are made of now, gets red hot. Perhaps the copper is not the exposed-to-exhaust layer.

5 posted on 07/19/2018 3:52:02 PM PDT by C210N (Republicans sign check fronts; 'Rats sign check backs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: C210N

One can create the engine such that the cold fuel or oxidizer cools the engine on it’s way to the thrust chamber.


16 posted on 07/19/2018 5:23:27 PM PDT by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: C210N
Therefore, temperatures used in rockets are very often far higher than the melting point of the nozzle and combustion chamber materials (~1,200 K for copper). Two exceptions are graphite and tungsten, although both are subject to oxidation if not protected. Indeed, many construction materials can make perfectly acceptable propellants in their own right. It is important that these materials be prevented from combusting, melting or vaporising to the point of failure. This is sometimes somewhat facetiously termed an "engine-rich exhaust". Materials technology could potentially place an upper limit on the exhaust temperature of chemical rockets.

Many fun details here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rocket_engine

18 posted on 07/19/2018 5:38:01 PM PDT by DUMBGRUNT (This Space for Rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson