>> A washed body that doesnt have a beating heart, and which had a serious blood loss before death, isnt going to leak as you think it would, if at all. <<
Jesus wounds persisted after resurrection; he tells Thomas to put his finger into the holes in his hands. Therefore, once his heart began beating again, it’s entirely reasonable to expect his wounds to resume bleeding.
>> Why do you depend on what a particular piece of cloth may (or may not) indicate? <<
That’s a baseless and offensive presumption.
“Jesus wounds persisted after resurrection; he tells Thomas to put his finger into the holes in his hands. Therefore, once his heart began beating again, its entirely reasonable to expect his wounds to resume bleeding.”
My conclusion above does not even attempt to pass judgement on whether Jesus was divine or not. It is simply a discussion about whether a particular piece of cloth can be linked to him. I am sorry that you seem to feel insulted, but it is a simple observation (mine, and others’) that so many people who so passionately defend the claim that the Shroud of Turin is the burial cloth of Jesus seem to be basing their faith in Jesus on the validity of this claim. If you don’t, then good for you, you are a thinking person, as well as a person of faith. If someone does tie together those two factors, then I have to question their faith. Frankly, anytime I see people so passionately defending the shroud, I am immediately on notice that they are placing enormous faith in a material object. While I cannot speak for Him, I think that God would be disappointed that many people don’t place their faith in Him.