Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Ancesthntr

>> A washed body that doesn’t have a beating heart, and which had a serious blood loss before death, isn’t going to leak as you think it would, if at all. <<

Jesus wounds persisted after resurrection; he tells Thomas to put his finger into the holes in his hands. Therefore, once his heart began beating again, it’s entirely reasonable to expect his wounds to resume bleeding.

>> Why do you depend on what a particular piece of cloth may (or may not) indicate? <<

That’s a baseless and offensive presumption.


46 posted on 07/18/2018 7:19:34 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: dangus

“Jesus wounds persisted after resurrection; he tells Thomas to put his finger into the holes in his hands. Therefore, once his heart began beating again, it’s entirely reasonable to expect his wounds to resume bleeding.”


That may be, but if that’s the case, then either he would not have been wearing the shroud, or it would have moved as he moved, smearing blood and other fluids all over the shroud and ruining the image. So, again, we are back to the issue of how a dead body with no blood being pumped through it, and which had been severely dehydrated and which bled out a lot before death, and which was washed prior to the shroud being put on it, could have so much blood leaking from it that it produced a detailed image. Bottom line: I simply do not believe that the Shroud of Turin is what it is claimed to be.

My conclusion above does not even attempt to pass judgement on whether Jesus was divine or not. It is simply a discussion about whether a particular piece of cloth can be linked to him. I am sorry that you seem to feel insulted, but it is a simple observation (mine, and others’) that so many people who so passionately defend the claim that the Shroud of Turin is the burial cloth of Jesus seem to be basing their faith in Jesus on the validity of this claim. If you don’t, then good for you, you are a thinking person, as well as a person of faith. If someone does tie together those two factors, then I have to question their faith. Frankly, anytime I see people so passionately defending the shroud, I am immediately on notice that they are placing enormous faith in a material object. While I cannot speak for Him, I think that God would be disappointed that many people don’t place their faith in Him.


47 posted on 07/19/2018 8:26:44 AM PDT by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson