OK, I made that last part up. But, really, nowhere does the article mention if The Mistress of Hell was also receiving the same briefings (supposedly she was...but they don't want to remind you of that. Current MSM rule: Hillary and “Russian” must never be mentioned in the same paragraph, hopefully not even in the same paper!
Bravo Sierra
That article really is a rehash.
01/06/2017 was the date the ICA was dated and released.
https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdX
(change pdX to pdf to read the declassified part of the ICA ridiculous document basically claiming social media and www usage as solid proof. Read the definition of HIGH CONFIDENCE at the end )
What nobody has been able to answer is:
how was Putin\Russia able to fix things to where Hillary wins the popular vote but DJT romps in electoral votes.
Here’s how it looked back then:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/06/us/politics/donald-trump-wall-hack-russia.html
Here’s DJT’s response.
see post 797
notice the current article draws different conclusions than the 01/06/2017 article about the same data.
Headline of the 7/18/2018:
“From the Start, Trump Has Muddied a Clear Message: Putin Interfered”
From the 01/06/2017 article:
“The 25-page report did not conclude that Russian involvement tipped the election to Mr. Trump.”
the briefing was after the election - HRC didn’t deserve a briefing... and also they couldn’t find her in the woods..