My friend and colleague, Mike Collins, who supervised much of the work at Gault is a no-nonsense sort of guy. I'd trust his results over almost anyone else's.
I haven't had a chance to work at Gault per se, but, I did work with Mike on graphical analysis of his excavations at the nearby paleo "Leander"site -- and his planning, execution, recording and analysis leave no room for phony claims.
I do have a number of other Texan friends and colleagues who still cling to the "Clovis First!" theory -- but their basis for still doing so is now almost 100% ego & stubbornness.
IMO, the results at Gault are the obituary for "Clovis First!"...
Thanks TXnMA.
We had a post recently about a pre Clovis site on an island up near Vancouver Canada that was about the same age I believe.
the theory is that they came by boat/rafts along the glacoer edges on the sea shores