1 posted on
07/14/2018 8:14:11 AM PDT by
Moonman62
To: Moonman62
Something like that should be easy to replicate in a lab, right?? /sarc
2 posted on
07/14/2018 8:16:07 AM PDT by
Bryanw92
(Asking a pro athlete for political advice is like asking a cavalry horse for tactical advice.)
To: Moonman62
3 posted on
07/14/2018 8:17:27 AM PDT by
Moonman62
(Give a man a fish and he'll be a Democrat. Teach a man to fish and he'll be a responsible citizen.)
To: Moonman62
I’d’ve thought the first animals would be single-celled.
IIRC, an animal does not have chloroplasts and needs to eat other things for energy (heterotrophic, with extremophiles aside).
5 posted on
07/14/2018 8:20:49 AM PDT by
P.O.E.
(Pray for America)
To: Moonman62
7 posted on
07/14/2018 8:25:25 AM PDT by
fruser1
To: Moonman62
9 posted on
07/14/2018 8:28:19 AM PDT by
RandallFlagg
(They all get down, and arm up. Ready to take down tyrrany. The magnificient Seven.)
To: Moonman62
Humans and a banana share 50% of genes. So take the “98%” in perspective.
11 posted on
07/14/2018 8:37:46 AM PDT by
I want the USA back
(Liberalism, like insanity, is the denial of reality.)
To: Moonman62
Why does sharing so many genes between life forms prove evolution? Does that show a bias by scientists? Could it more likely prove a Creator? Is it possible they are misreading data? Isnt it possible to look at all the historical information available and come up with numerous false scenarios? Is it possible that all the historical data reveals a Creation?
12 posted on
07/14/2018 8:49:35 AM PDT by
robel
To: Moonman62
From the article :
But our analyses show that these genes are also found in animals that do not have a nervous system, such as sponges. That means the genetic basis of the nervous system may have evolved before the nervous system itself did.
Not possible under strict evolution. The body would not evolve something for which it had no use.
13 posted on
07/14/2018 8:50:43 AM PDT by
Terabitten
(Time for the GOPe to reap the whirlwind.)
To: Moonman62
In before the obligatory photo of Helen Thomas.
18 posted on
07/14/2018 9:13:28 AM PDT by
gigster
(Cogito, Ergo, Ronaldus Magnus Conservatus)
To: Moonman62
Humans and mice share approximately 98% of genes, and have similar physiology and anatomy. This is because we share a relatively recent common ancestor
Nope...we share the same creator that created us 6000 years ago. What part of the "law of conservation of energy" do these people not understand?
30 posted on
07/14/2018 11:07:05 AM PDT by
Jan_Sobieski
(Sanctification)
To: Moonman62
First animal?? Oh I thought it was Michele Obama they were researching on...Sorry if I offended any FReepers...
39 posted on
07/14/2018 12:45:12 PM PDT by
Deplorable American1776
(Proud to be a DeplorableAmerican with a Deplorable Family...even the dog is, too. :-))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson