Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/14/2018 8:14:11 AM PDT by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Moonman62

Something like that should be easy to replicate in a lab, right?? /sarc


2 posted on 07/14/2018 8:16:07 AM PDT by Bryanw92 (Asking a pro athlete for political advice is like asking a cavalry horse for tactical advice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moonman62

A more detailed article is here:

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-04136-5


3 posted on 07/14/2018 8:17:27 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Give a man a fish and he'll be a Democrat. Teach a man to fish and he'll be a responsible citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moonman62

I’d’ve thought the first animals would be single-celled.

IIRC, an animal does not have chloroplasts and needs to eat other things for energy (heterotrophic, with extremophiles aside).


5 posted on 07/14/2018 8:20:49 AM PDT by P.O.E. (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moonman62

Tastes like chicken?


7 posted on 07/14/2018 8:25:25 AM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moonman62
Not really related, but funny:
True Facts : Pangolins Posse
9 posted on 07/14/2018 8:28:19 AM PDT by RandallFlagg (They all get down, and arm up. Ready to take down tyrrany. The magnificient Seven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moonman62

Humans and a banana share 50% of genes. So take the “98%” in perspective.


11 posted on 07/14/2018 8:37:46 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Liberalism, like insanity, is the denial of reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moonman62

Why does sharing so many genes between life forms prove evolution? Does that show a bias by scientists? Could it more likely prove a Creator? Is it possible they are misreading data? Isn’t it possible to look at all the historical information available and come up with numerous false scenarios? Is it possible that all the historical data reveals a Creation?


12 posted on 07/14/2018 8:49:35 AM PDT by robel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moonman62

From the article :

But our analyses show that these genes are also found in animals that do not have a nervous system, such as sponges. That means the genetic basis of the nervous system may have evolved before the nervous system itself did.

Not possible under strict evolution. The body would not evolve something for which it had no use.


13 posted on 07/14/2018 8:50:43 AM PDT by Terabitten (Time for the GOPe to reap the whirlwind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moonman62

In before the obligatory photo of Helen Thomas.


18 posted on 07/14/2018 9:13:28 AM PDT by gigster (Cogito, Ergo, Ronaldus Magnus Conservatus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moonman62
Humans and mice share approximately 98% of genes, and have similar physiology and anatomy. This is because we share a relatively recent common ancestor

Nope...we share the same creator that created us 6000 years ago. What part of the "law of conservation of energy" do these people not understand?
30 posted on 07/14/2018 11:07:05 AM PDT by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moonman62

First animal?? Oh I thought it was Michele Obama they were researching on...Sorry if I offended any FReepers...


39 posted on 07/14/2018 12:45:12 PM PDT by Deplorable American1776 (Proud to be a DeplorableAmerican with a Deplorable Family...even the dog is, too. :-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson