Wrong.
The court ruled on a charge of bank fraud. That charge ONLY.
Anything else the court may have said regarding charges not brought before the court is irrelevant regarding any other charge. The court made it very clear. Please re-read the materials that edzo posted to you with that in mind.
With all due respect, madam. :)
Bagster
Wrong sir :) Note the ANY non violent criminal .....this is the reason for my opinion.
After the entry of your client’s plea of guilty to the offense identified in paragraph 1
above, your client will not be charged with any non-violent criminal offense in violation of
Federal or District of Columbia law which was committed within the District of Columbia by
your client prior to the execution of this Agreement and about which this Office was made aware
by your client prior to the execution of this Agreement, all of which is contained in the attached
Statement of Offense. However, the United States expressly reserves its right to prosecute your
client for any crime of violence, as defined in 18 U.S.C. $ l6 and./or 22D.C. Code $ 4501, if in
fact your client committed or commits such a crime of violence prior to or after the execution of
this Agreement.
None so blind as he who does not want to see....