I have had enough. Sessions DOJ revoked Strzok’s clearance in June so how is peter testifying today that he used his security clearance access last night to prepare for the hearing? Is peter a Warlock?
Strozk acted as though he was surprised that his security clearance should have been revoked. And who was it that let that little issue slip? Lord, the corruption is just thick.
I recall this same question coming up when Susan Rice was given access to her old papers. Like with Rice, Strzok’s clearance would be limited to his ability to see material that he had worked on when he was still employed- my understanding is that they get this access because they have to testify. A court would order it anyway, and they can only see their old work product.
He's lying? Didn't he testify he wasn't biased? Believing him or your lying eyes?