Posted on 07/11/2018 10:42:10 PM PDT by ransomnote
I recall this same question coming up when Susan Rice was given access to her old papers. Like with Rice, Strzok’s clearance would be limited to his ability to see material that he had worked on when he was still employed- my understanding is that they get this access because they have to testify. A court would order it anyway, and they can only see their old work product.
The same thing happened with the hearings on Clinton. No one recalled anything. All looked like morons. A few days later all was well. Now they are all multi Millionaires. Same gonna happen in the current time frame unless something lights a fire under these people.
Having a clearance means nothing without access. And he may be unaware of any investigations regarding him but how would he know?
He's lying? Didn't he testify he wasn't biased? Believing him or your lying eyes?
You aren’t informed if you are the subject of a grand jury, you would be notified when charged not when being invesitgated.
When that has happened to me (quite a few times), sometimes it helps to right click on “post reply” and click “open link in new tab” and reply that way.
Strzok said today he used his TS SCI clearance to access info two days ago.
I believe , in certain circumstances, a person under investigation must be informed of same. Remember Trump pressing this issue?
That was an interesting exchange. Sounded like he was trying to throw ohr under the bus. I want to hear it again or read the transcript.
They mocked the Constitution and laughed in our face today... The establishment certainly does not fear retribution.
Utterly floored by what I saw today... a real AG would immediately fire and charge anyone who acted in such a manner. Instead, nothing is likely to happen.
IIRC, his clearance was stripped but reinstated on a limited basis so he could review papers for this hearing.
Which means nothing, was he doing original research or looking at his own overclassified working papers? He is trolling the right.
Does Strzok fall under these circumstances? He is a known liar, why are you placing so much weight on his words?
Now says “Ohr did not hand me anything. He provided other material to the F-I”, “that originated from Mr. Steele”. “I never personally received the dossier”, “the first time I saw it was in mid-September”.
Strzok now says, BRUCE OHR GAVE THE F-I DOCUMENTS INCLUDING THE DOSSIER and other documents provided by Mr. Steele
NOW STRZOK is getting mad again!
He’s trolling that’s for sure. The deepstate is laughing it up.
I have to log in every post.
Raskin is an idiot. Next thing you know he’s going to start talking about how POTUS watches the Gorilla Channel.
Hahaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
I am not placing any weight on his words. He is a complete and filthy liar. Hope he gets executed. All I said is there are certain situations where a “subject” must be informed if they are under investigation. POTUS was adamant that Comey inform him whether he was under investigation. Some Divisions require Target Letters to “subjects”. Not sure of the exact rules but I know this exists.
Why are you so upset? If Strzok is lying then Sessions is not investigating anything. do you believe in the 1.3 Trillion Sealed Indictments?
Gaetz was up and Strzok had that very weasel grin again & again. Gaetz kept calling Page his “girlfriend” ROFL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.