But the provision also could affect others accompanying U.S. forces in the field, including civilian government employees and embedded journalists....
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, I didn't miss it, what does it have to do with current situation? who is accompanying us forces in the field? McCabe Stroz Page Comey? You are entitled to your opinions no matter how far off the wall they are but not your own set of "facts" I suspect you have little experience or education in the criminal court system and are pulling things out of air that are not relevant. As for me being a troll, you couldn't be farther from the truth. Fact is you know nothing of my education or experience when it comes to investigations and civil and criminal matters especially at the federal level. I suspect my pertinent experience exceeds your age. This is a discussion forum and has all types of posters with a variety of experience.
Take a hint and do some real research before you throw more irrelevant spaghetti and try and stick it to the wall.
start with the US Attorneys manual then subject of defense to federal crimes pretrial motion challenging venue.
Venue a brief look at federal law governing where a federal crime may be tried.:p> https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RS22361.pdf regards
Yes your concern is noted troll but
For someone that claims to be so concerned with the minutiae of law. Tell me how is there a Russian collusion case when they have never even proven that Russia hacked the dnc?
How were fisa warrants woods verified with news articles leaked to Michael isakoff. Thanks. That came from the same sources as the dossier?
You can claim all you want that Nothing is happening but you don’t know for sure and at best you are guessing and we know you are just a miserable pessimist.