I don't see him making any such choice. I see the irate woman making that choice for him by accusing him of something horrible on the basis of very little if any evidence.
Considering that, it could be that his company dis not want to be associated with a person who calls the police on a family who is swimming on a pool that they own.
Because he should just be able to tell by looking at strangers whether they own the pool or not.
What is wrong with your thinking?
“I don’t see him making any such choice.”
At the moment he called the police, he elected to make it public record.
I have been asking myself the same thing about Blue House Sue for the last hour. Unfortunately, I haven't found any indication of a realistic answer yet.
(Shaking my head.....)