Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Hostage

I have followed George Webb (Sweigart) for most of the past two years, Certainly he covers U! in his videos. But the end of this thread, if you believe it is mind-blowing, stunning and, as far as I know, never mentioned before.


5 posted on 07/04/2018 1:45:15 PM PDT by Fractal Trader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Fractal Trader; All

Webb has done several thousand reports, so it’s very difficult to track all of what he’s done. I certainly can’t keep up with it all but I know how to get more detail by searching on his reports.

I use Webb as a resource to get further facts and answers, more granularity. For example, he covered Giustra, CF, and U1 in detail last year and again updated into this year.

The explosive detail at the end of the linked thread-reader was the involvement of Mueller and Rosenstein in U1, and hints of a planned nuclear war. Webb covered the former and hinted at the latter months and months before any others. At the time Webb was reporting these items, if it had been picked up by mid or consumer level outlets.it would have been branded as conspiracy kookiness.

I look at Webb as the raw layer of investigative fact gathering and issue generation, as supplemental background to what’s now emerging in consumer level newshub outlets such as FoxNews, Sara Carter, etc.

Webb does not ‘polish’ his reporting as say Foxnews does, meaning there is no corporate studio backdrop. Webb is street reporting including court dockets and direct as well as covert interviews with persons in the know. Webb also has a solid investigative team chasing things down that get mentioned in his reports.

Because Webb does not polish his reporting and because he does not spend time marketing and circulating it, it falls to viewers to circulate it.

When I see some good top layer reporting like Sara Carter’s or mid-layer like Furber’s, I may go to the raw layer established by Webb if there are facts and issues that were not covered or were not detailed enough. I can’t remember the thousands of reports that Webb has done so I use search terms to zero in on which reports are relevant.

Another example: using search terms “George Webb Rod Rosenstein Uranium One”

I retrieve several reports by Webb, two of which are:

Day 79.3 Uranium One To Iran Explains All (Nov 2017)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UCHxfDiCbZI
Where Webb includes related info to the Awans, timelines, FBI, and many others. Webb approaches these investigations by recognizing that the cast of bad actors involved are actually smaller than thought, so the same cabal is used in many of the scandals - Awans, Rosenstein, Mueller, Project Cassandra ... and he explains why Sessions effort to reopen U1 associated is tepid, He also talks about the logistic lines which are called ratlines and he includes among those drivers that were used in the USA and then murdered. He also includes facts such as HEU is worth $93 million per kilo which explains why criminals would be all over this. One could go on and on with this.

Day 55.1 - Three Amigos of Uranium One (Dec 2017)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KO3rNQloFZ8
Here the “Three Amigos” are Mueller, Rosenstein, and Comey.
Webb also includes important information about Navy Intel infiltration, Rod Rosenstein’s wife Lisa Barsoomian and much, much more.

Using Webb as a raw layer, as a background supplement provides a more complete picture of emerging scandals reported by others as if they were fresh and new. I know that Webb’s fact-gathering eventually reaches the President. For example, the $675,000 bribe that McCabe’s wife took from Clinton operative McAuliffe was reported by Webb before anyone else and months later it filtered up to the President who tweeted about it. This is not surprising as Webb worked for Rudy Guliani before and has many other high profile and important contacts.

Furber does a good job and it is welcome. But the explosive implication is that the globalist criminals including Hillary Clinton, Mueller, Rosenstein, Obama were on track to oversee/manage a launch of a nuclear war and the reason is clear:

* Wars cause a natural rallying around leaders.
* Hillary was rigged to win and become the US leader.
* Nuclear war would be a distraction of such intensity that no other stories would be able to supplant it.
* Nuclear war would allow for enemies lists to be compiled and executed on with zero resistance.
* The nuclear war would be settled and bring on global governance.
* The global settlement would usher in drastic measures such as global taxation, global arms and gun control, etc. basically world communism.
* Population reduction

Among Q, Sara Cater, FoxNews, Furber, Webb, the red pilling via social and broadcast media is well on its way.


15 posted on 07/04/2018 3:18:56 PM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson