well i try to follow it as much as i feel it deserves (not 100%), but sometimes (eg, photo of some tall white guy crossing street in hong kong) it seems semi-random.
imho a photo of a tall white guy crossing the street does not by itself prove anything in this day of photoshop, doctored online birth certificates not to mention CGI and AR.
i watched SB’s youtube dissection of the jetblue q drops, but unlike SB, I was not breathlessly convinced of anything in particular. SB imho is not using logic but really a series of presumptions, always in favor of whatever hypothesis he thinks Q is espousing. IOW, a suspension of disbelief. To me, that is dangerous, because when people start taking that kind of argument seriously, they start marching off cliffs (allegorically speaking).
I can model Q’s motivation towards the general public as much as a governor letting off steam and/or befuddling the deep state as an oracle.
Imaginably, there is some applicable Sun Tzu, though I am nowhere near learned enough to be able to find it and quote it.
Anyways, thanks, cheers and carry on!
If you were the white guy in the photo, up to no good, it would give you pause that Q - ie, the feds - knew where you were, when and what you were doing there.
Build your enemy a golden bridge over which he can retreat.